"I want to tell my critics representing either “wrong ideologies“, or “ideology of no ideology” about their persistence to force meaningless debate at a time of battle in the middle of the battlefield. Whether you like or not it is in fact wartime aiding the enemy."
"Useful Art" of World War II propaganda poster
The following is an example of what one of my critics says about my recent publication
Random Thoughts about Terrorist Warfare :
”You [Boris Tiraspolsky] mention in this post: "In a final analysis, modern terrorist warfare appears to be a new way of life that the Nation has to accept and endure for centuries ahead, and for a sake of own survival adjust to this new Reality of total World War..."
This view lacks perspective in my opinion. Our 'own survival?' Look at the casualties inflicted on our Nation to date at the hands of these pathetic, technologically retarded savages: statistically speaking, they have done no damage at all if you take into account other conflicts during our existence.
And now look at our successes in thwarting terrorist plots: those bozos who botched the Fort Dix plot, those idiots who botched the Sears Tower plot, (ad infinitem...). Boris, you know I read your material, but the basis of your entire blog is based on hyperbole: we as a Nation have got this under control, give or take. We've got it under control domestically. Our anti-terrorist effort is nearly as good or on par with the Israeli effort."
As a general rule I never reply to critics of my writings. They may say whatever they wish. I do not get into all these imposed discussions by two reasons. First one - my critics usually come up with extremely shallow and in most cases irrelevant ideas about a complex issue of Ideologically charged battle with Terror in general and on the American soil in particular. Second reason - I do not think I ever will be able to change minds of my critics, regardless of how profound my reply could be.
I am not naïve to expect everyone to like what I say. However, I do wish as many people as possible to realize an extreme seriousness of the subject I write about - modern terrorist warfare and anti-terrorist Instruments and Forces necessary to withstand terrorist attacks with conventional weapons and Weapons of Mass Destruction on the American soil.
The United States are in long term battle with irreconcilable enemy - Islamic jihadists intending to exhaust all Nation’s human and economic resources and brake the Will of Nation to resist. Consequently, our enemy is determined to replace the Constitution of the United States with the Islamic Law as the Supreme Law of the Land. My firm position is to the best of my ability to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against U.S. ideological enemies.
Therefore, when I see a slightest attempt of diminishing a significance of the subject of modern terrorist warfare and/or inevitable dramatic impact battle with Terror makes on life of the Nation, I change my general rule not to reply to my critics. I want to tell my critics representing either “wrong ideologies“, or “ideology of no ideology” about their persistence to force meaningless debates at a time of battle in the middle of the battlefield. Whether you like or not it is in fact wartime aiding the enemy.
Boris Tiraspolsky
Founding Member of