Posted by
Boris Tiraspolsky on Sunday, April 11, 2010 3:16:07 PM
"Ideological Collaborator with Enemy is a category of Ethics and Esthetics. Terrorism is immoral and ugly, regardless of its intentions. It is ethically wrong to surrender to Ideology of Terrorism, and politically, economically, socially, culturally appease it, and collaborate with terrorists. In addition to being ethically wrong, it is esthetically appalling to beautify Terrorism in any form and any shape in arts, and abusing "fredom of speech", publicly praise enemy by using mass media. It is easy to recognize Ideological Collaborator with enemy. One who expresses views, thoughts, opinions pleasing enemy and willing or unwillinglt demands actions in any way helping to achieve enemy's strategic goals is Ideological Collaboratlor with enemy." Boris Tiraspolsky Quotations and Maxims
There is a great deal of difference between appeasing enemy at a time of Peace and coraborating with enemy at a time of War. The most notorious example of appeasing enemy -- Nazi Germany -- was British PM Neville Chamberlain.
PM Neville Chamberlain could be qualified as Ideological Collaborator with Enemy.
Collaboration with enemy at a time of War is high treason. The most famous case of collaboration with enemy at a time of war was Vidkun Quisling, Minister President in occupied Norway from February 1942 to the end of World War II.
Vidkun Abraham Lauritz Jonssøn Quisling
His surname has become an eponym for "traitor", especially a collaborationist.
In some European languages, the term "quisling" has become a synonym for traitor, particularly one who collaborates with invaders. The term was invented by the British newspaper The Times in article of April 15, 1940, which was entitled "Quislings everywhere". The article asserted: "There are Quislings in every country in Europe." In almost seventy years one may assert that there are Quislings not only in Europe.
President Barack Obama's advisers plan to remove terms such as "Islamic radicalism" from a document outlining national security strategy and will use the new version to emphasize that the U.S. does not view Muslim nations through the lens of terrorism, counterterrorism officials say. The change would be a significant shift in the National Security Strategy, a document that previously outlined the Bush Doctrine of preventive war. It currently states, "The struggle against militant Islamic radicalism is the great ideological conflict of the early years of the 21st century."