About Me

Name: Boris Tiraspolsky
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Ideological Enemies of the Nation

"...we are in a midst of a decisive ideological struggle, or rather U.S. Ideological Civil War for the very existence of our Constitutional Republic. Most dangerous ideological attacks come from those in Power considering the Constitution of the United States to be an “unfinished document“. These ideological enemies of the Nation and their collaborates are not reluctant to routinely interfere with the Constitution when they see it does not fit their inexorable lust for power, money and privileges." - The time for Battle has come...
 
 
"Lincoln's constitutionalism, I believe, is the only effective rebuttal to progressive and civil rights criticisms. Thus if Republicans are serious about recovering constitutional government, it's hard to imagine how they would be successful without Lincoln. With Lincoln, it's hard to imagine how they would fail." - The political religion of the nation 
 
"Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties." - Abraham Lincoln

"Anyone who interferes with anything in the Constitution of the United States is an ideological enemy of the Nation." - Boris Tiraspolsky
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Stop the Islamization

"If we do not stop the Islamization, we will lose everything: our identity, our culture, our democratic constitutional state, our freedom and our civilization. In Europe we are already losing the right to free speech, the right to criticize Islam. I think, criticisms of religions or ideologies always ought to be possible in a free world. Human rights exist for the protection of individuals, not religions and ideologies."


Geert Wilders
 
Geert Wilders born 6 September 1963 is a Dutch politician and leader of the Party for Freedom. Born of a German father on the border town of Venlo and raised a Roman Catholic, the young Geert Wilders formed many of his political views in his travels to Israel and the neighboring Arab countries. His early job at the Dutch social insurance agency moved him to politics, where he worked as a speechwriter for the liberal People's Party for Freedom and Democracy. In 1996, he moved to the city of Utrecht, and represented his pluralistic neighborhood in the city council, and later the House of Representatives of the Netherlands.

Citing irreconcilable differences on the party's position on Turkish accession to the European Union, Wilders left the People's Party in 2006 to form his own party, the Party for Freedom. Since then, he has been outspoken on the issues of immigration, Islamic fundamentalism and freedom of speech. His provocative 2008 film about Islam in the Netherlands, Fitna, has received international attention, condemnation, and comparisons to Theo van Gogh. Due to death threats, he has been forced into guarded isolation, and has been banned from entering the United Kingdom since 12 February 2009.

Here is Geert Wilders's acceptance speech for the Freedom Award he was given by the Florida Security Council in Miami on April 27: Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The time for Battle has come...

"...the victorious future of the GOP entirely depends on this uncorrupted ideological platform no one can deny either inside, or outside the Party. As John Marshall once said: “... a constitution, intended to endure for  years to come, and consequently to be adapted to the various crises of human affairs”. -  The Party of the Ideology of the U.S. Constitution




Summary of the Speech by Boris Tiraspolsky
at the South Oakland Republican Club in Michigan
April 27, 2009


"The time for talking is over.
The time for Battle has come.
The minds of the People are sober.
We beat our Victory drum."
Anthem of  Useful Arts by Boris Tiraspolsky
1. Currently, we are in a midst of a decisive ideological struggle, or rather U.S. Ideological Civil War for the very existence of our Constitutional Republic. Most dangerous ideological attacks come from those in Power considering the Constitution of the United States to be an “unfinished document“. These ideological enemies of the Nation and their collaborates are not reluctant to routinely interfere with the Constitution when they see it does not fit their inexorable lust for power, money and privileges.

2. In spite of a defeat in November 2008, fractured and heavily outnumbered, the GOP remains the only real political Force in the United States that is capable of withstanding and successfully combating the ideological enemies of the Nation and their collaborators in the Battle for Fate of our Nation. Practical ideas and Eternal Ideals of the Constitution could become a unifying point for all members within the GOP, turning the GOP into a visible representation of the Invisible Hand of the Ideology of the Constitution.
 
3. In order to successfully conduct the U.S. Ideological Civil War and eventually win the war, the GOP needs to form a strong massive Force of Ideological Warriors - Public Instructors - professionally trained “to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution”. This Force needs to be present in every local municipality. It should be equipped with superior Ideological Instruments necessary to make practical ideas and Eternal Ideals of the Constitution to become an integral part of everyday life of the American people.

4. Neither the GOP Ideological Force, nor advanced GOP Ideological Instruments can appear miraculously by themselves. They need to be formed and established. No one actually knows how “to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States“ either. Therefore, learning how to “promote the Progress of… useful Arts” as it is mandated by the Constitution in Article 1, Section 8 may become an invaluable political, economic, social and cultural experience for the Republican Party.

5. Oakland County Republicans have a unique opportunity to establish the very first GOP School utilizing Ideological Instruments of “useful Arts“. The School will become a model for all the rest GOP organizations to learn how “to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution” and thus shifting a balance of Power in the county, impacting the political climate in Michigan and effecting the political process in the United States.

6. The future of the GOP depends on the Party’s ability to educate the general public and win over the minds and hearts of the American people as well as recruit new members and supporters for the GOP. Forming a strong and massive GOP Force of Ideological Warriors and developing superior Ideological Instruments of “useful Arts” are a must for achieving this objective. GOP School(s) will be instrumental in consolidating human and financial resources for taking back local, State and Federal institutions of Power. Victory will not be easy. However, without GOP School of “useful Arts“ it does not seem possible, at all.

Boris Tiraspolsky is a Founding Member of the AmericanIdeologicalSociety.com, Founder and CEO of National Endowment for the Useful Arts
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Expect push, push, push on all the fronts...

"Our enemies have taken the measure of Obama and Hillary Clinton. They are not bothering to wait. They know this is Jimmy Carter II in the White House, and they are acting accordingly. Expect push, push, push on all the fronts..."



Afghan-Pakistan: Al Qaida's new safe haven
By James Lewis

The Obama administration looks like it's going to acquiesce in the face of a nuclear-armed radicalized Pakistan, just as Jimmy Carter bowed down low in the face of Ayatollah Khomeini. Soon we will have two radicalized Muslim states with nuclear weapons and long-range missiles: A Shiite Iran, and a Sunni Pakistan. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Right message and right Messenger

"The Republican Party arguably is the only political party in the United States that still can produce both the “right” political, economic. social and cultural Message in “crises of human affairs” and the “right” Messenger to lead the Nation away from the historical “Dead End“ of Socialism currently offered by the Democratic Party to the American people." - Boris Tiraspolsky
 

The problem with Republicans
By Howard Underwood
 
This past election showed that Republicans in America are in trouble.  The culprit may simply be the public's fatigue with an eight year Republican administration (not to mention the fact that McCain ran a singularly inept campaign).  President Obama's startling ascendancy, though, a career trajectory that took place despite the absence of any meaningful resume and the presence of some very eyebrow-raising associates, indicates that the Republican Party's problems run deeper than fatigue and campaign ineptitude. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Seeing events through the eyes of others

"In real life, the political and strategic games used by politicians and statesmen are in fact social games – requiring social intelligence as well as technical mastery of information. The skills of the orator, cultivated by ancient statesmen like Cicero and Demosthenes, or by modern statesmen like Benjamin Disraeli and Abraham Lincoln, require emotional maturity and the talent of seeing events through the eyes of others."



Lessons Taken from Strategy Games
by J. R. Nyquist

Games of strategy, like chess, teach many lessons that are transferrable to everyday life. What is valuable in a game, as opposed to a book or public idea, is the way in which gaming mercilessly punishes error. A book or teaching may be popular in society, but how does society discover its errors? In games of strategy, like chess, a blunder is quickly punished. But in society, which is governed by a “politically correct” regime that manages our perceptions, blunders are often masked and good ideas are blamed for effects caused by bad ideas. Erroneous policies can remain in place for decades, until society finds itself in a crisis. But in a strategy game, one is forced to confront one’s own shortcomings. The player who adopts a bad idea is crushed by his opponent – who is immediately rewarded for his perspicacity. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Give us Sharia implementation or endure terror

"...the Taliban are conquering Pakistani land. Their technique is simple: Give us Sharia implementation or endure terror. Authorities have been choosing the morphine option: let them apply Sharia if they seize fire. But as soon as an area is “granted” to the jihadists, a new “jihad” begins towards the adjacent district."

70 miles.jpg
Taliban, 70 miles from Islamabad

The Taliban’s “AfPak” Strategy: A Jihadi Preemptive War
By Walid Phares

As the U.S. administration and its allies are devising a new strategy for the next steps in Afghanistan, the jihadists have already begun their next move — but this time it’s inside Pakistan. As I’ve written over the past few months, we need to look at Afghanistan, Pakistan and India as one regional battlefield where the “other side” is coordinating strategically, acting methodically and for sure beating the international coalition in speed. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

In danger of being destroyed

"There are three "whys" that ground America's historical success and prosperity. They are tradition, the Constitution, and education. These three concepts are interrelated and interdependent. If one of them falls then all three fall. And, at least at this moment in time, all three are in jeopardy -- not only of falling -- they are in danger of being destroyed."



Saving the Republic
By Larrey Anderson

"What can we do to win back our country?" Conservatives are asking themselves that question -- with increasing urgency -- every day.  They are desperately groping for a way to stop the twin avalanches of deficit spending and socialist programs that are hurtling down and shattering the once great mountain of a free republic that was the United States of America. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We are on notice

"In the long term, however, Islamists will likely recognize the limits of violence and increasingly pursue their repugnant goals through legitimate ways. Radical Islam's best chance to defeat us lies not in bombings and beheadings but in classrooms, law courts, computer games, television studios, and electoral campaigns. We are on notice."
 

"The former jihad theorist, Sayyid Imam al-Sharif (a.k.a. Dr. Fadl), now denounces violence: "We are prohibited from committing aggression," he writes, "even if the enemies of Islam do that."

The Limits of Terrorism
by Daniel Pipes
 
Does terrorism work, meaning, does it achieve its perpetrators' objectives? With terror attacks having become a routine and nearly daily occurrence, especially in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, the conventional wisdom holds that terrorism works very well. For example, the late Ehud Sprinzak of the Hebrew University ascribed the prevalence of suicide terrorism to its "gruesome effectiveness." Robert Pape of the University of Chicago argues that suicide terrorism is growing "because terrorists have learned that it pays." Harvard law professor Alan M. Dershowitz titled one of his books Why Terrorism WorksContinued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The concept of demoralization

To understand the concept of demoralization, let us turn to Robert Greene’s The 33 Strategies of War, Chapter 7: “The secret to motivating people and maintaining their morale is to get them to think less about themselves and more about the group.” In military affairs an army is demoralized the instant the individual soldier thinks only of himself. At that moment, the soldiers begin to run from the battle and the army dissolves. There is no resistance possible when each soldier looks only to his own safety."


Robert Greene’s The 33 Strategies of War

Understanding Subversion
by J. R. Nyquist

Yuri Bezmenov was a KGB officer who defected nearly three decades ago. In 1985 he gave an interview that can be viewed online. What he said is worth hearing.  According to Bezmenonv, “Only about 15 percent of [the KGBs] time, money and manpower was spent on espionage as such. The other 85 percent was a slow process [of] … ideological subversion or active measures … or psychological warfare. What it basically means is to change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that in spite of the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves….” Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Abraham Lincoln was born a Muslim?

  In a casting coup, Abraham Lincoln shares equal footage with luminaries of Islamic history like Saladin, King Faisal of Saudi Arabia and the former President of the UAE, Sheikh Zayed. What do they have in common?


Faruq Masudi, producer and director of
the new Islamic movie, Quran Contemporary nections 
 
Film Maker Faruq Masudi said: "Barack Hussein Obama is not alone. The 16th President of The United States, Abraham Lincoln, was born a Muslim.According to the Quran, everybody is born a Muslim. It is only by his own free will that a man chooses a different course for himself. In that Abraham Lincoln was not only a born Muslim but he chose to live by Islamic edicts like abolishing organized slavery; establishing equality of all human beings, democracy and accountability to God and Man; core Islamic concepts as propounded in the Holy Quran."...

Comment by Boris Tiraspolsky:

The statement above by director of the new Islamic movie, Quran Contemporary nections  provokes two questions.  First one is how in a world Abraham Lincoln could be "not only a born Muslim but he chose to live by Islamic edicts"? It sounds like a wishful thinking and pure fantasy by Faruq Masudi.

First of all Lincoln never considered the Holy Qurana to be the Supreme Law of the Land. That is what every Muslim must do. "It is only by his own free will that" Lincoln  chosen the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the United States only to be the Supreme Law of the Land. President Abraham Lincoln took an oath "to preserve, protect and defend" it. And he did. 

It was Abraham Lincoln's free choice when he unambiguously said: "Let every American, every lover of liberty, every well wisher to his posterity, swear by the blood of the Revolution, never to violate in the least particular, the laws of the country; and never to tolerate their violation by others. Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties." 

The second question is related to the Quran that was written in the 7th century, or about thirteen centuries ago. In contrast, the modern Civilization exists for about ten thousand years. 

I feel sorry for all those people who for almost nine thousand years had been born before existence of the Quran. Poor creatures! They never suspected that they were born Muslims according to the strict Islamic doctrine. Those people chosen "a different course for himself". Alas! They did not have  Faruq Masudi with his new Islamic propaganda movie.    
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

If you doubt me, just read the report

"A newly unclassified report from Homeland Security, sent to police stations and other law enforcement agencies around the country, says the big threat of domestic violence in the U.S. comes from "right-wing extremists."



War on 'right-wing extremists'
by Ideological Warrior of the Nation - Joseph Farah
 
It's not al-Qaida that has the Department of Homeland Security on edge. It's not Hezbollah that has the Barack Obama administration on guard. It's not Hamas that has the Feds working overtime on intelligence and security. Once again, it's the vast right-wing conspiracy. Here we go, again. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reaching out to enemies strengthens US?

“I hereby accuse the North American empire of being the biggest menace to our planet. They make us slaves. We must be ready for an aggression,” - 


President Obama shakes hand with Hugo Chavez

President Obama said:
"Reaching out to enemies strengthens our [US] hand. The whole notion was that if we showed courtesy or opened up dialogue with governments that had previously been hostile to us, that somehow would be a sign of weakness. The American people didn't buy it. And there's a good reason the American people didn't buy it — because it doesn't make sense.

It's unlikely that as a consequence of me shaking hands or having a polite conversation with Mr. Chavez that we are endangering the strategic interests of the United States.

If we are practicing what we preach, and if we occasionally confess to having strayed from our values and our ideals, that strengthens our hand. That allows us to speak with greater moral force and clarity around these issues. Our doctrine for engagement: We're not simply going to lecture you, but we're rather going to show through how we operate the benefits of these values and ideals.

Comment by Sen. John Ensign, R-Nevada: "I think it was irresponsible for the president to be seen kind of laughing and joking with Hugo Chavez."

Comment by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich:
"What I find distressing is that the administration opposes opening up oil explorationbut yet Obama has bowed to the king of Saudi Arabia and now reached out to Chavez, who has been conducting a vicious anti-American campaign. How do you mend relationships with someone who actively hates your country. ... Cuba releases zero prisoners, yet we make nice with Cuba. I'm for doing things methodically and calmly ... things that will work, but I'm not for deluding myself about smiles and words."

Comment by Boris Tiraspolsky:
  There are three rules of engagement one must follow in dealing with ideological enemies of the Nation: 1. Never reach out to them. Otherwise, it is called appeasement. 2. Never trust their "good intentions". Otherwise, it is called political naivete and blindness. 3. Never allow them to set a stage and dominate it. Otherwise, it is called ideological immaturity. 
 
President Obama did it all wrong. I want to remind my readers that denying these rules was always harmful to any Nation trying to "reinvent a wheel" in the past. I do not know how reaching out to enemies can strengthen US. But I know this does strengthen US enemies.  How deeply it will be "endangering the strategic interests of the United States" remains to be seen. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The same enemies

"...the progressive movement around the world and the Muslims have the same enemies. Their enemies are the Zionist occupation, American occupation, British occupation of poor countries, mainly Muslim countries."



Romancing the Jihad
Why are so many on the Left enamored with Islamism?
By Clifford D. May

Ask those on the Left what values they champion, and they will say equality, tolerance, women’s rights, gay rights, workers’ rights, and human rights. Militant Islamists oppose all that, not infrequently through the application of lethal force. So how does one explain the burgeoning Left-Islamist alliance? Continued... |
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The price of ignorance

"In this war against Jihad, America must decide if it can continue to tolerate the price of ignorance, or if instead it is willing to make the investment in strategic war planning, communication, clear identification of the enemy and its threats, and unified purpose necessary to defeat its enemies." - Jeffrey Imm


President Barack Obama released Bush-era memos about CIA interrogation techniques.
 
White House senior adviser David Axelrod said: “He [president Obama] thought very long and hard about it, consulted widely, because there were two principles at stake. One is … the sanctity of covert operations … and keeping faith with the people who do them, and the impact on national security, on the one hand. And the other was the law and his belief in transparency.

The president consulted officials from the Justice Department, the CIA, the director of National Intelligence and the Homeland Security Department. It was a weighty decision. As with so many issues, there are competing points of view that flow from very genuine interests and concerns that are to be respected. And then the president has to synthesize all of it and make a decision that’s in the broad national interest. He’s been thinking about this for four weeks, really.”

Comment by a former top official in the administration of President George W. Bush: “It is unbelievable! It's damaging because these are techniques that work, and by Obama's action today, we are telling the terrorists what they are. We have laid it all out for our enemies. This is totally unnecessary. … Publicizing the techniques does grave damage to our national security by ensuring they can never be used again — even in a ticking-time- bomb scenario where thousands or even millions of American lives are at stake.

I don't believe Obama would intentionally endanger the nation, so it must be that he thinks either 1. the previous administration, including the CIA professionals who have defended this program, is lying about its importance and effectiveness, or 2. he believes we are no longer really at war and no longer face the kind of grave threat to our national security this program has protected against.”

Comment by Boris Tiraspolsky: "We shall witness new terrorist attacks against the Unites States both, domestically and abroad, because terrorists never stop their sinister actions by themselves. We shall witness new terrorist attacks, because terrorists never satisfied with what they already accomplished. We shall witness new terrorist attacks, because terrorists see an ambiguity of our political elites reflecting anti-terrorist ideological immaturity of own constituencies, and therefore, incapable of decisively combating Terrorism and stopping terrorists from attacking the Nation." - Could We Be Defeated in Modern Terrorist Warfare?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive