About Me

Name: Boris Tiraspolsky
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

So let's have the debate!

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:33:11 PM
"Just come on this program [Mr. President]. Let's have a little debate. You tell me how wrong I am and you can convince the rest of the Americans that don't agree with you how wrong we all are."
 

Ideological Warrior of the Nation - Rush Limbaugh

Rush to the President: Debate Me

So let's have the debate! I am offering President Obama to come on this program -- without staffers, without a teleprompter, without note cards -- to debate me on the issues.  Let's talk about free markets versus government control.  Let's talk about nationalizing health care and raising taxes on small business. Continued...
 
Ideology of Anti-Terrorism is
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Actor Clint Eastwood said...

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Wednesday, March 04, 2009 1:10:46 AM

"Modern society lives in a state of fear over the possibility of being labeled racist for telling jokes based on ethnicity or nationality".


Actor Clint Eastwood 

Actor Clint Eastwood said: 

"People have lost their sense of humor.

"In former times we constantly made jokes about different races. You can only tell them today with one hand over your mouth otherwise you will be insulted as a racist.

"I find that ridiculous. In those earlier days every friendly clique had a 'Sam the Jew' or 'Jose the Mexican' -- but we didn't think anything of it or have a racist thought. It was normal that we made jokes based on our nationality or ethnicity. That was never a problem.

"I don't want to be politically correct. We're all spending too much time and energy trying to be politically correct about everything."

Comment by Boris Tiraspolsky with his poem of "useful Arts"*:
 
"It is alright to be unpleasant"
 
When no intelligence is present
When judgments don’t make any sense,
It is alright to be unpleasant
And call that lack of Common Sense!

Don’t compromise on Principles, and act
For being hailed as “politically correct“!

When no ability is present,
When Science is a false pretence,
It is alright to be unpleasant
And call that lack of Common Sense!

Don’t compromise on Principles, and act
For being hailed as “politically correct“!

When a spark of talent is not present,
When Arts are useless with no sense,
It is alright to be unpleasant
And call that lack of Common Sense!

Don’t compromise on Principles, and act
For being hailed as “politically correct“!
 
When sense of humor is not present,
When telling jokes is taking a chance,
It is alright to be unpleasant
And call it lack of Common Sense!
 
Don’t compromise on Principles, and act
For being hailed as “politically correct“!
______________________________
 
*Article I, Section 8, the Constitution of the United States.

The following story is attributed to the great Benjamin Franklin. When asked about “useful Arts” he replied with his usual wit and wisdom that Fifers and Drummers playing on parade are “Entertainment” and “Entertainers“. However, the very same Fifers and Drummers playing the very same music on a battlefield are “useful Art” and Warriors.

Ideology of Anti-Terrorism is
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ideological attacks against Rush Limbaugh

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Tuesday, March 03, 2009 1:13:03 AM

First attack: When CNN's D.L. Hughley referred to radio host Rush Limbaugh as "the de facto leader of the Republican party." "No he's not. I'm the de facto leader of the Republican party," Michael Steele said. The RNC chief went on to call Rush Limbaugh an entertainer. "Rush Limbaugh's whole thing is entertainment. Yes, it is incendiary. Yes, it is ugly." 

Comment by Rush Limbaugh: "So I am an entertainer and I have 20 million listeners because of my great song and dance routine. Michael Steele, you are head of the Republican National Committee. You are not head of the Republican party. Tens of millions of conservatives and Republicans have nothing to do with the Republican National Committee... and when you call them asking for money, they hang up on you. I hope that changes. It's time, Mr. Steele, for you to go behind the scenes and start doing the work that you were elected to do instead of being some talking-head media star."


Second attack: The Huffington Post web site published the following article Limbaugh Misquotes Constitution During CPAC Speech  that I have taken a liberty to repost in-full below: 
 
"During his much-discussed keynote address at the Conservative Political Action Conference on Saturday, Rush Limbaugh accused Barack Obama of pursuing the "bastardization of the U.S. Constitution."

It was one of the more politically acidic notes in a speech defined by rambling political assaults. But the conservative talk show host wasn't exactly standing on firm footing. Just a few moments earlier he himself had actually -- not theoretically -- "bastardized" the Constitution by confusing it with the Declaration of Independence.


We want every American to be the best he or she chooses to be. We recognize that we are all individuals. We love and revere our founding documents, the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. [Applause] We believe that the preamble to the Constitution contains an inarguable truth that we are all endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights, among them life. [Applause] Liberty, Freedom. [Applause] And the pursuit of happiness. [Applause] Those of you watching at home may wonder why this is being applauded. We conservatives think all three are under assault. [Applause] Thank you. Thank you.
Limbaugh, it seems, meant to say "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness," which, of course, is in the Declaration of Independence. Just to be sure, however, the Constitutional Accountability Center compared his remarks to the Constitution's preamble, and didn't find a match.

Here is the Constitution's Preamble: "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

In the end, of course, Limbaugh's gaffe was just that: a rhetorical hiccup in an otherwise long (the speech went on for 90 minutes) and brash address. Still, in the process of accusing Obama for a lack of reverence of the Constitution, it would have undoubtedly served him better to have properly recognized the Constitution himself."
 
Comment by Boris Tiraspolsky:

Rush Limbaugh is famous for his eloquence, improvisations and a true gift of a great orator. 

His speech at CPAC was not read, but delivered in Rush's usual free style well known to all his listeners for the last more then twenty years.  

The above accusations that Rush "misquotes Constitution" have no ground, whatsoever. The problem is in misquoting Rush Limbaugh by the Huffington post web site.

Think for yourself!

Rush said: "We love and revere our founding documents, the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence." After that he said: "We believe that the preamble to the Constitution contains an inarguable truth..."

There is nothing wrong here, so far. The problem of misquoting Rush by the Huffington Post web site begins ironically after the word "truth".

If they would have been less bias, they could have  put just a simple comma after the word "truth" in the transcript of the speech and only then they would have continued to quote Rush Limbaugh: "that we are all endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights, among them life. [Applause] Liberty, Freedom. [Applause] And the pursuit of happiness".

I sincerely recommend the Huffington Post web site to use more common sense next time. That could have certainly prevented them from my accusation in obvious and intentional misquoting Rush Limbaugh.
 
Ideology of Anti-Terrorism is
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A servant of two masters

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Monday, March 02, 2009 1:28:59 AM
"Secretary of Defense Robert Gates serves at a "pleasure" of president Obama. The very same was when the president was George W. Bush. In other words, any "displeasure" by Obama could cost Secretary Gates his position. He seems to appreciate it, and there is no doubt he is a right man to occupy it. However, it is not easy to be a servant of two masters for an honest man."


Secretary of Defense Robert Gates

Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said: "President Obama is more analytical [then George W. Bush]. And he [Obama] makes sure he hears from everybody in the room on an issue. And if they don't speak up, he calls on them. President Bush was interested in hearing different points of view, but he didn't go out of the way to make sure everybody spoke if they hadn't spoken before."

Comment by Boris Tiraspolsky. "To hear from everyone" is a valuable property described by Secretary Gates. Is that property truly reflects Obama's analytical skills? I am not sure about that.

I recall one of Obama's "contributions" to a military theory made not long ago: "“I am not opposed to all wars. I'm opposed to dumb wars.” This quote sounds on a surface so smooth, so lapidary, so eloquent, that one could not notice a total lack of common sense, at a first glance. 

There are different types of war I know: offensive and defensive wars, local and global wars, regular and asymmetric wars, conventional and people’s or rather guerrilla wars. Thanks to Obama's "discovery" now we may have “dumb wars”.

What does Obama mean? “Dumb” strategy, “dumb” tactics , “dumb” planning, “dumb” coordination. I am perplexed. The term “dumb wars”. does not make any sense to me when it comes to total modern terrorist warfare.

I honestly have no idea what “dumb wars” mean. However, I certainly know that the President of the United States at a time of war must not make reckless statements related to war, and of course, to be the man of common sense as the Commander-in-Chief. I have no doubt Secretary of Defense Robert Gates knows that too.
 
Ideology of Anti-Terrorism is
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Efforts to resuscitate the "peace process"

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Sunday, March 01, 2009 2:03:47 AM
"To suggest that Hamas may change with sanctions or appeasement, or that the people will rise up against the regime is absurd. Hamas controls all schools, media and mosques. This is a locked-down society."
 


Hamas and Jihadism
By Moshe Dann
 
Problems without solutions are frustrating, especially when the disputes are between warring groups and countries; so politicians, diplomats and envoys spend their time negotiating and trying to hammer out a deal, anything that will show progress. Continued...
 
Ideology of Anti-Terrorism is
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Russian regime is a KGB regime

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Saturday, February 28, 2009 2:49:13 AM

"Since the collapse of the USSR all American efforts to improve relations with Russia have come to nothing, says Illarionov, and new initiatives from President Obama are doomed..."


Andrei Illarionov

The Man Who Warned Congress
by J. R. Nyquist

On 25 February Andrei Illarionov testified before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. The hearing was titled “From Competition to Collaboration: Strengthening the U.S.-Russia Relationship.” Illarionov is a Russian citizen presently employed by the Cato Institute. He began his testimony with a brief explanation: “For a number of years I worked at different posts in the Russian government and Administration of the Russian President.” According to Illarionov the Russian regime is a KGB regime, and the United States policy toward this regime is worse than appeasement. It is best characterized as retreat. Continued...
 
Ideology of Anti-Terrorism is
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The new institutional anti-white racism

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Friday, February 27, 2009 1:51:21 AM

"[Bureaucrats] with a very few exceptions are interested in nothing, but Power and grabbing more Power, money and privileges for themselves. Needless to stress, that extensively growing professional bureaucracies in the United States are an indication of a decay of the State, corruption of the Government, and clear and present danger for a survival of the Nation at a time of current “crisis of human affairs“. - Boris Tiraspolsky



Black: The new color of privilege
by Ideological Warrior of the Nation - Joseph Farah 
 
New U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder famously said last week in a speech commemorating Black History Month that America is "a nation of cowards" on matters of race. Continued...
 
Ideology of Anti-Terrorism is
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

FBI issued a new warning

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Tuesday, February 24, 2009 10:09:40 PM

"Mueller said that terror groups could use homegrown radicals, rather than foreign terrorists, to infiltrate the country. He noted that there are "pockets of people around the world that identify with al-Qaida and its ideology" but act independently of its leadership."
 


FBI Director Warns of Mumbai-Style Attacks in U.S.

FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III issued a new warning Monday that terrorists are prepared to conduct Mumbai-style attacks on U.S. soil. Continued...
 
Ideology of Anti-Terrorism is
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The call to action as free people

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Tuesday, February 24, 2009 1:46:14 AM

"The emergency call on the threat to equality and liberty must be answered – by our government leaders – and by each of us as free men and women. We must heed the call - right now – no matter how inconvenient, no matter how tired we are, and no matter how frightening the responsibility is. That is what it means to be responsible for equality and liberty. That is what it means to be the home of the brave."



Nazism reincarnated as Islamic supremacism

The similarities between 1939 and 2009 continue apace as
Western democracies continue to toe the line with Islamist supremacism
by Jeffrey Imm

The speaker demanded that their supremacist ideology needed to be accommodated by the government, and called for a "new era." The speaker said that his people must be allowed to have laws in place to support this supremacist ideology. Continued...
 
Ideology of Anti-Terrorism is
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Stop Obama or U.S. will cease to exist

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Monday, February 23, 2009 5:03:06 AM
"Is he [Obama] president of the United States? According to the Constitution, in order to be eligible for president you have to be a natural born citizen. He has refused to provide proof. I'm not sure he's even president of the United States, neither are many of our military people now who are now going to court to ask the question, 'Do we have to obey a man who is not qualified under the Constitution?" - Alan Keyes

  
"Stop Obama or U.S. will cease to exist"
 
Alan Keyes said: "Obama is a radical communist, and I think it is becoming clear. He is going to destroy this country, and we are either going to stop him or the United States of America is going to cease to exist.  We are in the midst of the greatest crisis this nation has ever seen, and if we don't stop laughing about it and deal with it, we're going to find ourselves in the midst of chaos, confusion and civil war."

Comment by Boris Tiraspolsky: In order not "to find ourselves in the midst of chaos, confusion and civil war" the Republican Party must take the following five steps to "preserve, protect and defend" the practical ideas and ideals of the Constitution of the United States:

Step 1. The Republican party needs to reassess a role of the Democratic Party and to recognize it as the Party of "wrong ideology": political, economic, social and cultural, representing interests of Bureaucracies - Federal, State, Local and all those who support these Bureaucracies.

Step 2. The Republican Party needs to take an initiative in introducing widely the Ideology of the U.S. Constitution to be as Abraham Lincoln said "the political religion of the nation", representing interests of the People of the United States.

Step 3. The Republican Party needs to redefine own role from just an Instrument utilized for an election process to become a united Ideological Leader of the Nation, political, economic, social. cultural - the Party of Ideology of the Constitution of the United States.

Step 4. The Republican Party needs to form and establish own Ideological Force of Public Instructors functioning on a permanent bases all year around in every municipality of the country; the Public Instructors  must promote the Ideological Platform of the Republican Party: merge of conservative views and absolute Ethics and Perfect Esthetics of the U.S. Constitution for grassroots supporters, all interested parties and general population.

Step 5. The Republican Party needs to develop working superior Ideological Instruments in ongoing ideological Battle with "wrong ideology" of the Democratic Party; these Ideological Instruments include Education and Training for rank and file Members of the Republican Party, ideologically charged PR and "useful Arts" - more specifically Useful Performing Arts advancing the Ideological Platform of the Republican Party.
 
Ideology of Anti-Terrorism is
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Racism perpetrated by Eric Holder

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Sunday, February 22, 2009 2:48:12 AM

"Too many of us are unwilling to respond to real racism perpetrated by the likes of Eric Holder, Barack Obama, and Jeremiah Wright by repudiating their bigotry in loud, bold language. "


The attorney general Eric Holder 

A Nation of Cowards?
By Matthew May

Of course, Eric Holder is correct. When it comes to race we Americans are, for the most part, a nation of cowards. This cowardice was on full display during the most recent presidential election and continues today. Continued...
 
Ideology of Anti-Terrorism is
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Attorney General Holder said...

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Friday, February 20, 2009 12:54:45 PM

"My fear... that we are taking steps that, rather than advancing us as a nation, are actually dividing us even further." -  Excerpts from Atty Gen Holder's remarks on race



Attorney General Holder's remarks on race

Attorney General Holder said: "Though this nation has proudly thought of itself as an ethnic melting pot, in things racial, we have always been, and we, I believe, continue to be, in too many ways, a nation of cowards. Though race-related issues continue to occupy a significant portion of our political discussion, and though there remain many unresolved racial issues in this nation, we, average Americans, simply do not talk enough with each other about things racial.

It is an issue that we have never been at ease with, and given our nation's history, this is in some way, understandable. And yet, if we are to make progress in this area, we must feel comfortable enough with one another, and tolerant enough of each other to have frank conversations about the racial matters that continue to divide us."

Comment by Boris Tiraspolsky: It looks odd and dubious when the ruling Party that has currently the black elected President, the black Attorney General and a number of other black top officials begins to raise an issue of a race problem in America and returns to rhetoric of the past under the garnish of integration “black history into our culture”.
 
I just wonder where did a political appointee and career bureaucrat Mr. Holder see a “disintegration” of black history from “our culture” for the last time? Does he also believe that the Constitution of the United States was written by White Supremacists?

Mr. Holder complains that “in things racial, we have always been, and we, I believe, continue to be, in too many ways, a nation of cowards”. So, I recommend Mr. Holder to read the article by Tom Adkins that was written right after the victory of Barack Obama - The Era of White Guilt is over
  
Why is Mr. Holder trying to prove otherwise? “…race-related issues continue to occupy a significant portion of our political discussion, and though there remain many unresolved racial issues in this nation, we, average Americans, simply do not talk enough with each other about things racial”.

The answer is simple “average Americans” do not talk “about things racial” because there are much more important things to talk about : economic crisis, terrorist war. “Because the vast majority of white Americans didn't give a fluff about skin color, and enthusiastically pulled the voting lever for a black man.” As Tom Adkins also pointed out “in the 60s, American liberals began yanking that millstone while sticking a fork in the eye of black Americans, exacerbating the racial divide to extort a socialist solution.” 

The current attempt by Mr. Holder to return the Era of White Guilt is a sinister sign of the ruling Party’s ideological bankruptcy. Lacking true creativity these bureaucrats offer old hat socialist recipes to solve problems facing the Nation. These recipes never worked. That seems to be a true reason for provoking a new artificial spiral of racial issue in order to blame in own failure somebody else - “a nation of cowards“.
 
Ideology of Anti-Terrorism is
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (10) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Preselected reporters to ask questions

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 1:14:48 AM
"President Obama is not a mentally retarded person! He even knows what an enigmatic abbreviation “the FATA region of Pakistan” is."



_____________________

President Obama says - Boris Tiraspolsky comments
 
 
There are generally two types of questions. One is to learn something new. Another one is to examine someone. There is a third type specifically invented by the White House preselected reporters: question that contains a ready answer. Read the question below, please.

Question: Mr. President, do you think that Pakistan and -- are maintaining the safe havens in Afghanistan for these so-called terrorists?

Comment by Boris Tiraspolsky: This question could be directed to someone who is either mentally retarded, or by a some reason has never read newspapers, watched television, listen to a radio, or used the Internet in the duration of the last seven years, at least.

President Obama: Well, I think that Pakistan -- there is no doubt that, in the FATA region of Pakistan, in the mountainous regions along the border of Afghanistan, that there are safe havens where terrorists are operating.

Comment by Boris Tiraspolsky: President Obama is not a mentally retarded person! He even knows what an enigmatic abbreviation “the FATA region of Pakistan” is. Frankly, I did not know that. So, I learned something knew here: FATA means the Federally Administered Tribal Areas in Pakistan bordering Afghanistan. Alas! That was the only new thing I learned from the president Obama’s answer.

President Obama (continues): And one of the goals of Ambassador Holbrooke, as he is traveling throughout the region, is to deliver a message to Pakistan that they are endangered as much as we are by the continuation of those operations and that we've got to work in a regional fashion to root out those safe havens.

Comment by Boris Tiraspolsky: Now, I have my question to president Obama. What have the U.S. Military and the NATO been doing out there for the last seven years? Haven’t they tried “to root out those save havens”?

President Obama (continues):  It's not acceptable for Pakistan or for us to have folks who, with impunity, will kill innocent men, women and children. And, you know, I -- I believe that the new government of Pakistan and -- and Mr. [President Asif Ali] Zardari cares deeply about getting control of the situation. We want to be effective partners with them on that issue.

Comment by Boris Tiraspolsky: I understand that “we want to be effective partners” with Pakistan. The similar line I heard from president Obama about Iran, too. However, the problem is whether the governments of Pakistan, Iran and other Islamic States sincerely want the same. I got lost here. And it seems that I was not the only one who got lost at that point.

Question: (off mic)

President Obama (continues): Well, Mr. Holbrooke is there, and that's exactly why he's being sent there, because I think that we have to make sure that Pakistan is a stalwart ally with us in battling this terrorist threat.

Comment by Boris Tiraspolsky: The above statement by president Obama is an example of a lack of coherent international policy. I want to remind that the recent change of the government in Pakistan happened primarily because the old Pakistani Administration was “battling this terrorist threat“ as a close ally with the United States. Now Pakistan Agrees to Enforce Islamic Law in Swat Valley. Therefore, will Pakistan that supports Taliban in the FATA region continue to be “a stalwart ally with us“ remains to be a big question. Why didn’t president Obama tell us the truth, then?
 
Ideology of Anti-Terrorism is
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (16) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We are on our way to a new alliance

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Monday, February 16, 2009 1:45:47 AM
Useful Art of Satire. It is a literary work used to ridicule or make fun of human vice or weakness, often with the intent of correcting, or changing, the subject of the satiric attack.



Obama's Letter to Ahmadinejad
By Lauri B. Regan

Satire
Dear Mahmoud,

I won! (I just love saying that.) And as promised throughout my historic campaign, I am now reaching out to you Mahmoud, Holocaust denier, funder of terrorism, despotic ruler of Iran. This symbolic gesture of my respect is just the beginning of my grand plan to bolster my rightful place in history. Continued...
 
Ideology of Anti-Terrorism is
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The political religion of the nation

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Thursday, February 12, 2009 1:46:47 AM
According to Abraham Lincoln the U.S. Constitution is "the political religion of the nation". Therefore, the GOP as the party of Abraham Lincoln "needs to become the Party of the Ideology of the U.S. Constitution and the Leader of the Nation, representing and truly advancing the absolute Ethics and the perfect Esthetics of the Supreme Law of the Land. The Party that could realistically narrow the gap between the Spirit, the Word, the Intent of the U.S. Constitution and the reality the American people live in." - Boris Tiraspolsky


Abraham Lincoln

"Let every American, every lover of liberty, every well wisher to his posterity, swear by the blood of the Revolution, never to violate in the least particular, the laws of the country; and never to tolerate their violation by others."

"Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties."
________________________________

Lincoln's Defense Of Constitution Is Moral For Today's Republicans
By THOMAS KRANNAWITTER

This is the 200th birthday of the first Republican to win a national election, Abraham Lincoln. It is good for Republicans today to remember Lincoln, not to be antiquarians, but to learn from his principled defense of the Constitution. Continued...
 
Ideology of Anti-Terrorism is
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (30) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12…101112131415161718…6061Next »