About Me

Name:Boris Tiraspolsky
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Terminate the threat of Islamism

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Friday, June 20, 2008 8:42:47 PM

"In the final analysis, Islamism presents two main challenges to Westerners: To speak frankly and to aim for victory. Neither comes naturally to the modern person, who tends to prefer political correctness and conflict resolution, or even appeasement."



The Enemy Has a Name
by Daniel Pipes

If you cannot name your enemy, how can you defeat it? Just as a physician must identify a disease before curing a patient, so a strategist must identify the foe before winning a war. Yet Westerners have proven reluctant to identify the opponent in the conflict the U.S. government variously (and euphemistically) calls the "global war on terror," the "long war," the "global struggle against violent extremism," or even the "global struggle for security and progress." Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Endorsing values of Islamic jihadists

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Thursday, June 19, 2008 3:28:29 AM
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony Kennedy, John Paul Stevens, David Souter and Stephen Breyer are
Ideological Collaborators with Enemy
Definition of Ideological Collaborator with Enemy


"Useful Art" of the Cold War anti-communist poster -
just change the word "Communism" for the word "Islamism"
_______________________________

Old-new "politically incorrect" vocabulary
by Boris Tiraspolsky
 
Expressions "collaborator with enemy" and “ideological enemy” are not very common in a “politically correct” vocabulary currently used in the United States. Anyone pointing out at "collaborators with enemy" and/or  “ideological enemies” takes a great deal of risk to be accused in “neo-McCarthyism” and all other “deadly” “politically incorrect” sins. However, the Nation does have a true ideological opponent. It is Islamic jihad with sword and related to it Ideology of Terrorism. 
 
Everyone in America learns that according to the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States the Government cannot create or inhibit religion. The Government cannot ban most types of speech, restrict the press. The Government cannot stop people from gathering peacefully, or prohibit citizens from asking the Government for reform. These are “blessings of Liberty” every American enjoys.

In the contrast, the Ideology of Terror, and in particular the Ideology of the Islamic jihadists inhibits all religions, but own believes, whatever those believes are. Islamic jihadists categorically prohibit free speech, but expressions of own views, and totally restricts all free, but only permitted by them press. They forbid any gatherings of people, but those who support them.  

Needles to stress, that adepts  of the Ideology of Terror coming to Power, the way it happened in the former USSR in 1917 and in the Nazi Germany in 1934, establish regimes that cannot be reformed, whatsoever. These regimes can only be totally destroyed as the Nazi Germany, or collapse as the former USSR.

The United States happened to be the very last barrier on Islamic jihadists’ way to become the only existing World Power. In order to achieve their strategic goals, terrorists need to deteriorate the will of the Nation to fight Terrorism. For that very reason terrorists utilize a “smart” strategic weaponry - ideologically charged suicide bomber, intending to use conventional and non-conventional weapons aimed at the U.S. civilian population. (Read more...)
 
For the very same reason Islamic jihadists utilize the Ideology of Terror historically proven to be very effective Instrument of an oppression. They plan to provoke in minds of the U.S. population all sinister manifestations of Terror: fear, panic, anxiety, shock, fright, scare in order to conclusively brake the will of the Nation to withstand Terror, and finally achieve terrorist’s objectives of becoming the only existing Power in the World. 

It is erroneous to be ideologically “neutral” in the War on Terrorism without indirectly and/or directly endorsing wicked “values” of Islamic jihadists. Therefore, the U.S. civilian population must learn how to actively refuse to go along with the Ideology of Terror in any forms and shapes. It does require a strong National Character, and this is a historic Mission of the Nation. 

Terrorism, or rather Islamic jihad is an adamant ideological challenger of the free and sovereign Nation. Therefore, one of the main purposes for establishing U.S. Civilian Self-Defense (Read more...) is for the entire population of the United States to become prepared mentally and physically to resist Islamic jihad and above all to defy ominous ideological manifestations of Terror. (Read more...)  

There is no doubt that it is categorically wrong to be “open minded” by appeasing terrorists, regardless of their believes. All those who by any reason cry off to say “no” to the War on Terrorism, all those who obey the evil will of Islamic jihadists, all those who allow their minds to surrender to corrupt demands of Terror are de facto ideological collaborators with enemy and consequently, enemies of the Nation.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Didn't we make this mistake before 9/11?

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Thursday, June 19, 2008 1:15:30 AM
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony Kennedy, John Paul Stevens, David Souter and Stephen Breyer flat-out sided with the enemy – with people who have done everything they possibly could to express their desire to destroy as many Americans as possible.



Jaw-dropping lunacy of the Supreme Court
by Joseph Farah
 
I don't really expect to persuade any of the five Supreme Court justices who ruled last week that enemy combatants captured on the battlefield and held at Guantanamo Bay deserve civil trials in the U.S. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Terrorist use of weapons of mass destruction

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Wednesday, June 18, 2008 1:14:57 AM
"...the world will be confronted by the nuclear genie in his malevolent forms for the foreseeable future. We must adapt our intelligence and policy efforts to confront the threat along its entire continuum in a persistent, sustained manner. It must be a global effort incorporating police, intelligence services, militaries, government agencies and ministries, and citizens across the world."
 

 Rolf Mowatt-Larssen, Director,
Department of Energy Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence

The Strategic Threat of Nuclear Terrorism

On June 16, 2006, Rolf Mowatt-Larssen, director of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence addressed The Washington Institute's Special Policy Forum. The following is the prepared text of his remarks. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Thank God for heroes like Ross McGinnis

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Tuesday, June 17, 2008 8:17:46 PM
"Ross Andrew McGinnis, of Knox, Pennsylvania, was born on June 14, 1987, to Tom and Romayne McGinnis. Recognizing that he was not interested in attending college, Ross enlisted in the U.S. Army's Delayed Entry Program on his seventeenth birthday, June 14, 2004. He finished high school, graduating in 2005, and then entered basic training. He was nineteen when he died a hero's death in Iraq on December 4, 2006."


Specialist Ross Andrew McGinnis
____________________________________________________

A Love Greater Than Life Itself
A hero's story
by Doug Patton
 
The average age of the American servicemen who fought to liberate Europe from Fascism and the Pacific from Japanese Imperialism was nineteen. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I want to warn Americans

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Monday, June 16, 2008 1:08:36 AM
“Russia is a global player and understands its responsibility for the fate of the world,” explained Medvedev [President of the Russian Federation]. “We want to participate in setting the new rules of the game.”


Kremlin, Moscow
______________________________

Up to Old Tricks
by J. R. Nyquist

A friend from the Dark Continent recently sent me a story about Communist China’s growing dominance in Africa. “Strange you don’t see that much protest from those who are against imperialism and war,” he noted ironically, “only if imperialism and war happens to be under the flag of a Western nation such as the United States.” When Europe built roads and mines and ports in Africa it was called “evil.” Now that China builds roads and mines and ports in Africa it is called “cooperation based on mutual benefit.” What is beneficial about the Maoist regime in Zimbabwe, or the Marxists of Namibia or Congo or the ANC? What good has come of the Chinese presence in Sudan? Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Five Useful Rules of Survival

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Sunday, June 15, 2008 1:24:38 AM

Five rules of survival everyone must know and share with others


The rest is your knowledge and responsibility
___________________________________________________________

Five Useful Rules of Survival for the First 100 Minutes After 
Explosion of Weapons of Mass Destruction

 Continued...

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The state of mass denial about Jihad

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Saturday, June 14, 2008 1:08:27 AM
"Justice Anthony Kennedy delivered the majority opinion of the Court, in which Justices John Paul Stevens, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Stephen Breyer, with Justice Souter providing a concurring opinion."


U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy
_____________________________

Don't You Know There's A War On?
By Jeffrey Imm

I am sending U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy a framed copy of a photograph of the remains of the World Trade Center West building after the 9/11 attacks with a note "Don't You Know There's A War On?". Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

U.S. Ideological Civil War in progress

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Friday, June 13, 2008 8:40:01 PM
"I believe if the American people understood what five members of the Supreme Court did yesterday, siding with the 9/11 attackers over U.S. civilians, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony Kennedy, John Paul Stevens, David Souter and Stephen Breyer would all be in danger of being lynched. Fortunately for them, the American people pay little attention to Supreme Court rulings."
 

Standing, left to right: Associate Justices Stephen G. Breyer, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Samuel Alito. Seated, left to right: Associate Justices , Anthony M. Kennedy, John Paul Stevens, Chief Justice John Roberts, Associate Justices Antonin Scalia and David H. Souter
__________________

Justices side with the enemy

The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday waved the white flag of surrender before al-Qaida and its Islamo-fascist allies throughout the world. That's how I interpret the ruling that terrorist enemy prisoners being held at Guantanamo Bay have a constitutional right to challenge their detention in civilian courts in the U.S. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Could We Be Defeated in Modern Terrorist Warfare?

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Friday, June 13, 2008 1:51:05 AM

In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court ruled that habeas corpus protections apply to detainees held at Guantanamo Bay. Justice Antonin Scalia is outraged: “America is at war with radical Islamists. … Our Armed Forces are now in the field against the enemy, in Afghanistan and Iraq... The game of bait-and-switch that today’s opinion plays upon the Nation’s Commander in Chief will make the war harder on us. It will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed... Today the Court warps our Constitution... The Nation will live to regret what the Court has done today.”


"Useful Art" of Icon of St. George
riding a white horse and killing the dragon
 
One of legends about St. George relates to his encounter with the dragon that representing devil. According to this legend, a pagan town in Libya was victimized by a dragon which the inhabitants first attempted to appease by offerings of sheep and then by the sacrifice of various members of their community to the monster. But St. George arrived, killed the dragon, and converted the pagans into Christianity.
_________________________________________
 
Could We Be Defeated in Modern Terrorist Warfare?

The answer is sober and straightforward: yes, we could be defeated! The United States is currently involved in ideologically charged battle, with no end on a horizon, and many unpleasant surprises ahead! We have lost people, we have lost property. The U.S. Government had not been either vigilant enough to prevent the devastating terrorist event of 9/11, no take strategic advantage of own success in early stages of military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq.

We shall witness new terrorist attacks against the Unites States both, domestically and abroad, because terrorists never stop their sinister actions by themselves. We shall witness new terrorist attacks, because terrorists never satisfied with what they already accomplished. We shall witness new terrorist attacks, because terrorists see an ambiguity of our political elites reflecting anti-terrorist ideological immaturity of own constituencies, and therefore, incapable of decisively combating Terrorism and stopping terrorists from attacking the Nation.

Terrorists inevitably will perform more horrible inhuman acts until we finally learn how to fight this obscure ideologically charged terrorist warfare, and eventually win it. However, at the present moment it is far ahead in Future! The problem is that terrorists are ready for a next strategic move, and we are not ready to protect our own population in possible terrorist attacks with Weapons of Mass Destruction. Could anything be done to avoid this horror? 

We ought to act with no procrastination. We need intelligently regroup our existing Forces, develop our new superior ideologically charged anti-terrorist National Strategy, create appropriate for ideological war anti-terrorist Ideological Instruments and Forces. We must adjust ourselves for that new National Strategy calling for total Mobilization of the Nation in the War on Terror. 

We must stop act like children entertaining the most dangerous illusion of all, that we could not be ever defeated. Alexander the Great made a fatal mistake by believing he could not be ever defeated. Where is the Alexander’s Empire? Romans made the same mistake. Where is that great Empire? Napoleon made a similar mistake. There is no Napoleon’s Empire either. Hitler made the analogous assumption of never being defeated. Where is the Third Reich now?

Should not we learn from those Historical mistakes, or for a sake of “feeling good about ourselves” we should ignore the gloomy reality of modern terrorist warfare? Time has come to say “good bye” to illusions about this war! As any ideologically charged warfare, terrorist war is TOTAL by a given. In simple words it means: either they kill us, or we kill them. And there is nothing in between. There is no nutrality in battle either! 

Yes, we could be defeated, or rather killed by terrorists in this total war, if we, as the Nation, continue to blindly believe in “humanity” of our lethal enemies and "sacred greatness” of their ideological roots. One must realize once and forever, islamic jihadists consciously and deliberately relinquish all men properties, and turn themselves into absolute wickedness and transgression of devil. 

Modern Islamic Terrorism is that dragon killed by St. George, and resurrected nowadays. The dragon-devil met the People of the United States. Therefore, it is ethically and esthetically fine not for a moment to hesitate to mop all terrorists up from the Historical Stage. The latter inherently belongs not to the dragon, but to the People! That is why I join the outrage of  Justice Antonin Scalia.

Contributed by Boris Tiraspolsky,
Founding Member of
American Ideological Society  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

In the battle for the hearts and minds

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Friday, June 13, 2008 1:33:24 AM
"In the battle for the hearts and minds of the American people, the Democrats work hard to silence information that undermines their agenda and they are winning. While the military fights for victory, Democrats plot their defeat, not on the battlefield, but in the minds of the very citizens they serve. In this, they diminish us as a nation and inch us ever closer to defeat."



Losing the Information War with Amendment 56
By Lance Fairchok
 
The Democrats are angry. Despite investing enormous effort undermining the military, things are going fairly well in Iraq. General Petraeus and the surge have been a success, not that you would know that from the media coverage, which has been, to say the least, sparse. The anti-Bush themes of an "Iraqi quagmire" and "surge failure" were premature, and all the congressional show hearings, the choreographed Code Pink performance art and the MoveOn.org smears were for naught. The president and the military did it right, and the Democrats got it wrong. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Strategic thoughts about the U.S. War on Terror

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Thursday, June 12, 2008 3:47:09 AM
"The U.S. War on Terror in which the current combating Islamic jihadists represents just one of many operational fragments has no time limits, no precise topography and requires anti-terrorist operations that form unlimited number of battlefields on three major anti-terrorist Theatres of War: Military, Economic and Ideological."



Three Theatres of Anti-Terrorist War
by Boris Tiraspolsky,
Founding Member of 
 
Modern terrorist warfare is in essence undeclared total war for exhaustion enemy’s human and economic resources. It is de facto rapidly escalating global confrontation between diverse and relatively small groups of terrorist-aggressors, their sponsors, and very loosely organized anti-terrorist resistance formed out of different States either directly attacked by terrorists and/or anticipating terrorist attacks in the future. In other words, modern terrorist warfare is in fact unconventional total siege warfare. (Read more...)
 
In this type of war all involved sides are using “totality of maneuvers” of conventional and unconventional Instruments and Forces with an intent as much as possible to reduce enemy’s military power, decrease enemy’s economic capacity and diminish enemy’s ideological strength with a strategic objective to brake enemy’s will to resist.

The U.S. War on Terror in which the current combating Islamic jihadists represents just one of many operational fragments has no time limits, no precise topography and requires anti-terrorist operations that form unlimited number of battlefields on three major anti-terrorist Theatres of War: Military, Economic and Ideological.

In contrast to the World War I and World War II, where each Theatre of War was relatively independent, Military, Economic and Ideological theatres of modern terrorist warfare characterize hierarchal dependency on each other. Therefore, it is absolutely vital that all three anti-terrorist Theatres will become integral parts of “useful” Operational Art and function simultaneously as ONE BATTLE WITH TERROR unifying efforts of both the U.S. Government and the U.S. population.

It is impossible to deny that the Military Theatre of anti-terrorist operations logically including Law Enforcement and Intelligence, totally depends on engaging operations of anti-terrorist Economic and Ideological Theatres. On the contrary to terrorist economic Instruments of Terror (Read More...), Economic Theatre is operating with anti-terrorist Economic Instruments and Economic Forces (Read more...). The latter are fully responsible for anti-terrorist economic mobilization of the Nation.

Ideological Theatre of anti-terrorist war forms the top of the mentioned above hierarchy. Both, Military and Economic Theatres entirely counts on Ideological Theatre responsible for anti-terrorist ideological mobilization of the Nation. Its realization wholly relies on a presence in battle superior defensive and offensive ant-terrorist Ideological Instruments and anti-terrorist Ideological Forces necessary to withstand ideological Instruments of Terror (Read more...) and sustain the will of the Nation to resist.
     
In other words, when the U.S. Military - arguably the best military on the planet - performs successful anti-terrorist operation - this is a direct result of a right coordination and mutual effort of all three Theatres of War: Military, Economic and Ideological. On the conrary, any U.S. Military defeat needs to be looked at first in weaknesses of defensive and offensive U.S. anti-terrorist Economic and Ideological Instruments and Forces. The very Instruments and Forces the Nation still does not have available in battle with Terror.  
 
When it comes to U.S. anti-terrorist Ideological Instruments, let me reiterate what I said many times: it is unrealistic to successfully conduct ideologically charged battle with Terror without an inclusive U.S. anti-terrorist Ideological Education on all levels and mighty U.S. anti-terrorist Public Relations, or rather anti-terrorist Propaganda Machine combining mass media, press, book publishing, Internet, and etc. It is not viable, whatsoever, to win “ideological struggle” without ideologically charged arts, including “useful” Performing Arts (Read more...) - drama, opera, ballet, music, motion pictures, TV shows, radio shows, and other basic Ideological Instruments.
 
Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude: due to the mentioned above specifics of modern terrorist warfare, and without available superior defensive and offensive anti-terrorist Economic and Ideological Instruments and Forces, forming along with the Military Theatre also Economic and Ideological Theatres of anti-terrorist war, the War on Terror cannot and will not be won by using just U.S. Military might alone. It is true, regardless of how powerful and superior U.S. Military Instruments and Forces could be.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Never surrender to terror

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Thursday, June 12, 2008 3:27:43 AM
"I understood that we are not going to win this war by knockout - but by points. I understood that we wouldn't be able to use our power and we should find a way to deal with the terrorists surgically and to enable the Palestinians who are not involved in the terror attacks to live their life... it's very easy to say it's quite difficult to implement."
(click here)

Currently, Moshe Ya'alon is is a senior fellow at
the Adelson Institute for Strategic Studies at the Shalem Center
_______________________________

Islamists can be defeated
War against Jihadists requires uncompressing effort by entire western world
by Moshe Ya'alon
 
The Islamist Jihad wave did not begin in September 2001 with the attack on the US. The Iranian revolution in 1979 marks the historic turning point where fanatical Islam began to gain strength and confidence. Iran's role as a Muslim state served as a source of inspiration for the emergence of al-Qaeda, the strengthening of the Muslim Brotherhood movement and the rise of Hamas – these are varying movements and often even rival ones, but they share the common goal of Islamization. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How did NAFTA do that?

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Wednesday, June 11, 2008 4:28:05 AM
"Fifteen years later, we can see NAFTA only exacerbated economic problems for Mexico – creating even greater divides between the very rich and the very poor in that corrupt, socialist country."



North American Free Trade Agreement
______________________

Where have all the workers gone?
by

To listen to John McCain's pleas for more "guest workers," expansion of "free trade" programs that inequitably pit foreigners against Americans and amnesty for illegal aliens already in the U.S. and those still arriving daily, you would get the impression our country desperately needs help from the outside world just to meet its most basic needs. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Senator John McCain said...

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:27:49 AM

"[Obama] "is a liberal, doctrinaire Democrat.”


Senator John McCain 
________________________________

Senator John McCain said: “You know one of his [Obama's] favorite phrases is that I would be a Bush third term. Well I think maybe his proposals could be a Carter second term." 

Comment by Boris Tiraspolsky:

I am positive that Senator McCain will not "be a Bush third term". With all due respect my question is will be Senator McCain a Statesman the Nation badly needs in the current unprecedented "crisis of human affairs"? (Read more...)

As far as it concerns Senator Obama, I honestly think that even all failures of former president Carter will look like little shortcomings compare to what the Nation may be facing, if Senator Obama becomes the President of the United States.

I am more and more getting inclined to join a view by Joseph Farah  Why McCain must lose. This seems to be the only way the Nation has a chance to elect the next President who could be a "Reagan third term".

Twenty five years ago the 4Oth President of the United States Ronald Reagan was speaking to liberals in the West, when he exhorted: "I urge you to beware the ... temptation of blithely declaring yourselves above it all and label both sides equally at fault, to ignore the facts of history and the aggressive impulses of an evil empire, to simply call the arms race a giant misunderstanding and thereby remove yourself from the struggle between right and wrong and good and evil...  It is an Evil Empire. It's time to close it down." 

What great words by the great Statesman!

Just "an Evil Empire" is different nowadays. It is incomparably more dangerous then the former USSR. This new enemy intents to kill us all and replace the Constitution of the United States with the Islamic Law as the Supreme Law of the Land. (Read more...)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12345678910…3435Next »