About Me

Name: Boris Tiraspolsky
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Collaborator with Enemy - Jesse Jackson


"In politics, an organized minority is a political majority." - Jesse Jackson


Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez (Read More... )
decorates the Reverend Jesse Jackson with
the Liberator's Order at the Miraflores Presidential Palace in Caracas, Venezuela

Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Latin America - danger of Terrorism

"These [Latin American] leaders may see themselves as populists addressing years of historic inequities in their homelands, but their strategic alliances are ranging dangerously far afield, into sponsors of state terrorism and the growing nexus with transnational criminal syndicates."




The Changing Dynamic in Latin America
 by Douglas Farah


Several recent stories highlight the growing dangers faced in Latin America, where many of the once-idealistic leaders of the old Left are now making alliances of convenience to counter U.S. influence in the region. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ideological immaturity of the Nation

"The failure to recognize the ideological nature of “cause celebre” for Islamic jihadists creates great confusion in minds of the American people and U.S. political establishment."


Imaturity of American Daydreamer
______________________________

Ideological Struggle and Ideologicsl Immaturity of the Nation

The U.S. Ideological Civil War - to fight or not to fight Terror - is the reality the Nation has to face and deal with. It is a struggle” between those who usurped “constitutional rights” and those who accept Constitutional Responsibilities at a time of War. 

First part of the Nation's political elites takes advantage of the freedom of speech to voice their mostly ignorant, although, influential “opinions”, on “life or death” matters of total terrorist warfare waged against the Nation. 

The second part of the U.S. poliical elites is in minority. It slowly - two slowly - accepts emerging principles of new U.S. Ideology of Anti-Terrorism necessary to “secure the Blessings of Liberty”, and for survival of the Nation in battle with Terror.

One of the hottest debates in the homeland “ideological struggle“ today, is that the United States is “less secure” because of the war on Terror, or more precisely the military operation in Iraq.

People expressing this particular “opinion” usually quote the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) report of April 2006: “the Iraq conflict has become the “cause celebre” for jihadists, breeding a deep resentment of U.S. involvement in Muslim world and cultivating the global jihadists movement”. 

The quote from the NIE presented above is an example of ideological numbness of those who wrote it, and a lack of knowledge of those who repeat it. The truth of the matter is that the sole genuine “cause celebre” for jihadists is and always was the Ideology of the Islamic Law formed more then thousand years before establishing the United States.

From the time of Muhammad (570-632 AC) the Islamic Law explicitly declares that all nations must surrender to Islamic rule, if not its faith. In other words, all non-Islamic Nations are a perpetual subject for jihad, or Holy War, and could be never absolutely “secure“. 

Throughout centuries the Ideology of the Islamic Law underwent times of victories and times of defeats. However, all inspirations and motivations for jihadists come only from two main ideological authorities of Islam - Koran and Hadiths.

Koran is the Supreme body of the Islamic Law, that describes jihadists who die for their faith, as martyrs deserving a unique place in heaven. Hadiths is a record of the Prophet Muhammad’s precepts, actions, and his life, constituting his Sunna, or example of the “role model” for jihadits.

The failure to recognize the ideological nature of “cause celebre” for jihadists creates great confusion in minds of the American people and U.S. political establishment.

All of us need to learn a bitter, although, pragmatic lesson of the Global War on Terror: it is not “the Iraq conflict“...or “U.S. involvement in Muslim world... cultivating the global jihadists movement”, but the current vagueness and frailty of U.S. Ideology of Anti-Terrorism!

Boris Tiraspolsky
Founding Member of
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ideological Power of the U.S. Constitution

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, not prohibited to it by the States are reserved to the States respectively, or to THE PEOPLE”. (The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States)



______________________________________

The Constitutional Responsibility of the People
to “Promote the Progress of ... useful Arts”

The Constitution of the United States delegates Power “to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts” to the U.S. Congress. It also precisely defines how “to promote Science and useful Arts by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries”. Article I, Section 8. 

The U.S. Congress follows the order of the Constitution. However, the U.S. Congress oversteps delegated by the Constitution the limited Power to “promote the Progress of Science” and assumed the Power of appropriations for promoting Science financially.

In contrast, the U.S. Congress never appropriated promoting ideologically charged  “useful Arts” financially, and specifically "useful" Performing Arts, since the time of abandoning fifers and drummers on battlefields. (Read  more...)

To be fair, the Government supports all sorts of arts. However, all Government’s grants with practically no exception awarded to individuals, who actually abandoned “useful Arts”, as Ideological Instruments of the Nation. Many of those modern writers, actors, artists openly confront “useful Arts” as “corny”, “old hat“, and even “politically incorrect“. 

No wonder, that the main Government Agency sponsoring arts in the United States is called the National Endowment for the Arts, and not for “useful Arts”, as the Constitution directs.

While the U.S. Congress broadens the Word of the Constitution by de facto promoting Science financially, the U.S. Congress relinquishes the responsibility to equally and proportionally promote “useful Arts”. All that resulted in flourishing of Science in the United States, and total vanishing of “useful Arts”. 

Consequently, at a time of the ideologically charged total terrorist warfare, when “useful Arts” are indispensable for Ideological superiority of the Nation in battle and sustaining the Will of the Nation to resist Terror, they are not available even as basic Ideological Instruments. It is imperative that “useful Arts” ought to be resurrected, and the Progress of “useful Arts” must be promoted equally and proportionally to Science at a time of the War on Terror. 

But who does get the Power to “Promote the Progress of ... useful Arts”, while the U.S. Congress gave up that Power, and de facto literally starved “useful Arts“ to death? 

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, not prohibited to it by the States are reserved to the States respectively...” (The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States) So, do the States get Power to “Promote the Progress of ... useful Arts”?

Nothing of the kind! No States have a provision for promotion of “useful Arts” in States Constitutions. Therefore, States have no Constitutional Power to “Promote the Progress of ... useful Arts” either.  So, who does get the Power to “Promote the Progress of ... useful Arts”, after all?

Let‘s read the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States once again: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, not prohibited to it by the States are reserved to the States respectively, or to THE PEOPLE”. 

According to the Supreme Law of the Land the Power to “Promote the Progress of ... useful Arts” in a broad sense belongs to "the people". To you, myself, all of us.
  
There is no one else, but “the people” got the Power to bring “useful Arts” being vital in ideologically charged battle with Terror back to life. This Power is Ideological Power of the Constitution of the United States, and it is real.

It is the Ideological Power to strengthen the Will of the Nation in battle against all enemies, foreign and domestic. It is the Power to promote the Progress of “useful Arts“ serving as Ideological Instruments in “decisive ideological struggle of the 21st century“. 

The Ideological Power is delegated to the people by the Constitution, and cannot be denied! However, there is no Power without Knowledge. And there is no Knowledge without Education. (Read more...)  

That is why it is the Constitutional Responsibility of the people of the United States to get useful knowledge of “useful Arts”, first, and then “faithfully execute” the Ideological Power “delegated to “the people” by the Supreme Law of the Land.

Boris Tiraspolsky
Founding Member of
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Anti-Terrorist Spirit, Word, and Action - Part Three

"It is a grand mistake to think of being great without goodness and I pronounce it as certain that there was never a truly great man that was not at the same time truly virtuous." - Benjamin Franklin



"Without continual growth and progress, such words as improvement, achievement, and success have no meaning." - Benjamin Franklin 
__________________________________

Dialog Between Student and Public Instructor in “useful Arts” about the anti-errorist Action of the Constitution of the United States  

Student: What is the anti-terrorist Action of the Supreme Law of the Land to protect, preserve and defend the Spirit and the Word of the Constitution?

PI: The anti-terrorist Action of the Constitution of the United States directly derives from the original order of the Supreme Law of the Land.  

Student: What is the “original order “of the Supreme Law of the Land?

PI: The original order of the Constitution is the order by the People of the United States to themselves “to form a more perfect Union“. It is the everlasting call for a benevolent and relentless formation of “a more perfect Union” with merge absolute Ethics and perfect Esthetics of the Constitution. The Union that embraces different cultures, and different people, regardless of the color of their skin, religious believes, and human preferences.  

Student: Is it correct to say that the Spirit, the Word and the Action of the Ideology of the Islamic Law are manifestations of the Spirit of Destruction?

PI: No it is absolutely not. The embodiment of the Spirit of Destruction is Terrorism turning the Ideology of the Islamic Law into a convenient Instrument of Terror. The entire blame for the current triumph of radicalism in Islam is on spiritual leaders of Islam allowing for different reasons this shameful abuse of the great World Religion.  

The truth of the matter is that establishing of the Islamic Law was one of the very first precedents in the History of the Mankind to introduce the Supreme Law of the Land based on a merge of Ethics and Esthetics of the Medieval Era. At the time of forming the Ideology of the Islamic Law, the latter was the embodiment of the creative Spirit, the inspiring Word, and the noble Action by the Founding Father of the Islamic Law Prophet Mohammed.

The Constitution of the United States arrived on the Historic Stage eleven and a half centuries later, as the “more perfect” Supreme Law of the Land initiating a merge of absolute Ethics and perfect Esthetics of the Era of Enlightenment” . Therefore, it is natural for the older Supreme Law of the Land to challenge the younger one on the Arena of Ideas. The evil part is to deliberately provoke a deadly confrontation between these two powerful Ideologies by evoking radical elements in both of them.

This enduring Ideological War can lead to a total destruction of the entire Civilization, and vanishing of any Ethics and Esthetics. Ironically, both Ideologies represent thousands of years of relentless search for the most perfect merge of Ethics and Esthetics, in order to finally form the Ideal World of everlasting peace, prosperity, and joy.

Student: Now I know what the anti-terrorist Spirit, the anti-terrorist Word, and the anti-terrorist Action of the Supreme Law of the Land are. They represent most perfect merge of Ethics and Esthetics at a time of battle with Terror. Thank you.

PI. You are welcome. Do you have any more questions?  

Student: Yes... and no... Isn’t that incredible that the Invisible Hand of the Constitution leads the Nation in battle with Terror and directs the Nation to the “more perfect” Future at the same time?

PI: Yes, it is. But the most astonishing fact is that the Invisible Hand of the Constitution is always present in every day life of the People.

Student: Not in mine... What should I do to feel the presence of the Invisible Hand in my life?

PI: Well... I cannot teach you how to do it, but you can learn it yourself.  

Student: How?

PI: Just follow three simple rules.

Student: I am all ears...

PI: First rule: be always creative yourself. Second rule: never compromise creative relationship you already have with other people. Third and the most important rule: always try to bring more people to your creative circle, and incessantly enhance your relationship with them by adding “more perfect” creativity every time you have an opportunity to do that.

Student. I’ll try. Although, it is easier sad then done...

PI: No one says that it is easy, but I have my all confidence in you. 

Boris Tiraspolsky
Founding Member of 
American Ideological Society

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Anti-Terrorist Spirit, Word, and Action - Part Two

 "Those who stand for nothing fall for anything."
Alexander Hamilton




“The sacred rights of mankind are not to be rummaged for among old parchments or musty records. They are written, as with a sunbeam, in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand of the divinity itself; and can never be erased.” - Alexander Hamelton
__________________________

Dialog Between Student and Public Instructor in “useful Arts” about the anti-terrorist Word of the Constitution of the United States  

Student: What is the “anti-terrorist Word” of the Constitution?

PI: The anti-terrorist Word, or rather the “key word” of the Constitution of the United States directly derives from the original Word of the Supreme Law of the Land.

Student: What is the “original Word” of the Supreme Law of the Land, then?

PI: The original Word of the Supreme Law of the Land is the entire body of the original text of the Constitution of the Unite States, that consists of 4400 words and “ordained and established for the United States of America“. As any text, the Constitution of the United States contains a so called “key word” being an integral part of the text. The “key word” of the Constitution is a total, absolute, and entire embodiment of the creative Spirit of the Supreme Law of the Land, and therefore, it is “anti-terrorist Word” of the Constitution.

Student: What is that magic “key word”?

PI: In the beginning of the United States was the inspiring “seed word” that became the “key word” of the Constitution. And it was the word of five letters: “U-N-I-O-N” - “Union”. The “key word” of the Constitution is the word “Union”. And all things in the United States were made by that “key word“; and without the word “Union” “was not any thing made that was made“. The last truth is that when the Union ends, everything ends.  

Student: I understand: “United we stand, divided we fall” So, anti-terrorist Spirit of the Constitution is “Creativity“ in contrast to the destructive Spirit of Terrorism. Anti-terrorist Word of the Constitution is a call to sustain the existing “Union” contrary to physical destruction of the Union intended by terrorists. Is it correct?

PI: Yes, it is. 

Boris Tiraspolsky
Founding Member of 
American Ideological Society

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Anti-Terrorist Spirit, Word, and Action - Part One

"Establishing of the Islamic Law was one of the very first precedents in the History of the Mankind to introduce the Supreme Law of the Land based on a merge of Ethics and Esthetics of the Medieval Era. The Constitution of the United States arrived on the Historic Stage eleven and a half centuries later, as the “more perfect” Supreme Law of the Land initiating a merge of absolute Ethics and perfect Esthetics of the Era of Enlightenment”



“No People can be bound to acknowledge and adore
the Invisible Hand, which conducts the Affairs of men more than
the People of the United States.”
George. Washington, The First Inaugural Address, 1789 

The U.S. Constitution in battle with Terror
(click here)
________________________________

Dialog Between Student and Public Instructor in “useful Arts” about the anti-terrorist Spirit of the Constitution of the United States  

Student: Could you explain to me, what the “anti-terrorist Spirit” of the Constitution is, please?

PI: This is not difficult to grasp. The anti-terrorist Spirit of the Constitution directly derives from the original Spirit of the Supreme Law of the Land.  

Student: What is the “original Spirit” of the Supreme Law of the Land, then?

PI: The original Spirit of the Supreme Law of the Land represents the Spirit of Creativity. The latter is one of two rival Driving Forces of the Universe. The Spirit of the Constitution, or rather what the Framers of the Constitution called the “Invisible Hand”, is an inclusive manifestation of the everlasting Spirit of Creativity in every day life of People, and in all accomplishments of People in “the Progress of Science, and “useful Arts“.  

Student: How do you define the opponent “driving force” of the Universe?

PI: The opponent to the “Invisible Hand” of the Constitution is the Spirit of Destruction. The latter is adapted by terrorists. The Ideology of Terrorism is in fact, an embodiment of the Spirit of Destruction. Logically, the Ideology of the Constitution of the United States based on the Spirit of Creativity is anti-terrorist Ideology by a given. 

Boris Tiraspolsky
Founding Member of 
American Ideological Society
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Terrorist newest technologies

"How can traditional counter-intelligence operations deter or undermine this emerging threat? They can't. Not unlike Iraqi IEDs, these innovative technologies require new doctrines, new training and new tactics to cope."



Jihadinets
By Roderick Jones
This piece was co-authored with Michael Schrage

Terrorists are early adopters of new technologies - especially if they're cheap and easy to acquire. Al-Qaeda's global embrace of the Internet was no surprise. The virtual world of jihadi chat rooms, online recruitment and networked proliferation of deadly terrorist techniques has entered the public consciousness. No serious security observer now doubts that radical Islamist groups are adept at exploiting online environments. Therefore, the most visible recent advances in the realm of online collaboration -virtual worlds and social networking sites - will likely be adapted for use by extremists. The benefits these platforms provide for military training and operational command & control sharing are clear. The inevitable adoption of these systems by extremists will likely mirror past online developments: quiet experimentation across a number of platforms and mainstream systems, followed by the creation of password-protected digital enclaves that incubate future destruction. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

September 11 Memorial and Museum

"The site must speak to future generations as equally as it does to us. No one may alter or omit history in order to impose their own meaning and to dictate what visitors should think and feel.Yet this is all we are getting at the WTC site."



9/11 WTC Memorial Will Betray America
By Michael Burke

The "National September 11 Memorial and Museum at the World Trade Center" foundation, under the direction of Chairman Mayor Michael Bloomberg of New York City is currently conducting a nationwide fundraising tour. However, what Bloomberg is not telling the American people is that the memorial will remake the WTC site so that it does not acknowledge the attacks. As per the 13 member memorial jury that dictated the memorial concept none of the authentic artifacts of the World Trade Center or 9/11 can be returned to the site "in order to preserve the integrity of the memorial." Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Usefiul Art of parable

A parable is a brief, "useful" story in prose or verses that illustrates a moral lesson.
______________________

THE BLIND MEN AND THE ELEPHANT
 



Poetic version of the famous Indian parable 
by John Godfrey Saxe (1816-1887)
 
According to ancient Greek philosopher Plato (Read more...)
parables encapsulate an abstract argument into a concrete,
more easily grasped narrative.
________________________________
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Senator Barack Obama said...

"This war is a bad idea".
 


Senator Barack Obama
_____________________________________

Senator Obama said: “I am not opposed to all wars. I'm opposed to dumb wars.” 

Comment by Boris Tiraspolsky:
 
Dear Senator! Your statement sounds on a surface so smooth, so lapidary, so eloquent, that one could not notice a total lack of common sense, at first glance. 

First of all, one cannot vote against war, and not being oppose to war at the same time. There is the honest saying by great Winston Churchill: “I think a curse should rest on me — because I love this war. I know it's smashing and shattering the lives of thousands every moment — and yet — I can't help it — I enjoy every second of it.” So. be honest too, and make up your mind, please.

The second comment is on your contribution to the Theory of War. There are different types of war I know: offensive and defensive wars, local and global wars, regular and asymmetric wars, conventional and people’s or rather guerrilla wars. Thanks to you theoretical discovery now we may have “dumb wars”.

What do you mean? You mean “dumb” strategy, “dumb” tactics , “dumb” planning, “dumb” coordination. I am perplexed. Your term “dumb wars”. does not make any sense to me when it comes to total modern terrorist warfare.

I honestly have no idea what your “dumb wars” mean. However, I certainly know that any credible candidate for the office of the President of the United States at a time of war must not make reckless statements related to war, and of course, to be the man of common sense as future Commander-in-Chief. (Read more...)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Global Jihad

"The Bush Administration and the media have focused on Islam as a "religion of peace" and have done little to educate the public about the presence of Islamist groups on American soil, the level of their infiltration and their ultimate objectives."



Islam: Not Just Another Religion
By Janet Levy

This campaign season, presidential candidates seem intent on battling each other with a war of words over universal healthcare, tax reform, immigration, the war in Iraq, the economy and Biblical literalism. Yet, they have spent few words on and have literally ignored the greatest threat to America and Western civilization since the Cold War:  the global jihad. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Enemy of the Nation - President Chavez

"We must confront the privileged elite who have destroyed a large part of the world".


President of Venezuela Hugo Chavez 
___________________________________ 

“I hereby accuse the North American empire of
being the biggest menace to our planet.”

*****
“They make us slaves,”

*****
We must be ready for an aggression,”

*****
"Socialism builds and capitalism destroys.”
______________________
 
Chavez: “This is something that is historic for us.
We are going to work very hard,”


President Chavez and president Ahmadinejad
 



President Hugo Chavez and president Putin

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The blind mind of the Nation

“Generalizations are shadows of Reality, and manifestation of a blind human mind.” - Boris Tiraspolsky, Quotations and Maxims


U.S. Capitol
_______________________________

The Blind Mind of the Nation

Theoretically speaking, the U.S. Congress is supposed to be the collective Mind of the Nation. The Congress should have a precise realistic Vision of “a more perfect” Future for the Nation. In his own turn President needs the Political Will to lead the Nation through all historic difficulties and obstacles to that “more perfect”  Future. 

In reality the collective Mind of the Nation - the Democratic-controled Congress - is absolutely blind. Moreover, it is deaf, and incapable of hearing independent voices of reason screaming and yelling to stop the Nation from slouching into abyss, the blind Congress cannot see. Thank God the Nation still has the President with a strong Political Will, and irrevocable commitment “to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States“!

How many times all of us recently heard generalizations by members of the Congress: “the American people want this”, “the American people demand that”, “the American people voted against the war”? In order to cover these meaningless clichés, Democrats shamelessly add the word “majority”. The latter creates even stronger misleading generalizations that “the majority of the American people” is always right. Thus Democrats in the Congress justify their pushing the Nation to defeat in battle.

Currently, any rational independent thought in America is doomed to be a part of a “minority” and in opposition to the blind Congress. This historic model could be hardly considered productive even at a time of Peace. Generalizations in the name of the American people facing ideologically charged enemy with Weapons of Mass Destruction are misleading the Nation in seeing the Truth about itself and recognizing perilous reality of the War on Terror.

The blind and deaf Congress along with confused “majority of the American people” need to learn that a national debate representing opposite views in combating Terrorism is a legitimate exercise in “freedom of speech“ at a time of peace. At a time of total terrorist war waged against the Nation, the very same debate turns into U.S. Ideological Civil War (Read more...) between American patriots and ideological collaborators with enemy. (Read more...)  

Boris Tiraspolsky
Founding Member of 
American Ideological Society
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Intelligence analysis of our time

"The worst blockhead in the official analysis business knows that the shopping public shouldn’t be frightened, and the paranoia of domestic extremists shouldn’t be fed. What the politicians want is “the good news” up front. They want positive solutions. They want to look good to the shoppers and the retailers. So if there isn’t a slick answer to a problem, if the answer is “blood, sweat and tears,” then the problem doesn’t exist. In fact, it mustn’t exist."

U.S. Intelligence
____________________________

ANALYSIS FOR THE SAKE OF CONVENIENCE
by J. R. Nyquist


National intelligence and grand strategy are not subjects for the weak-willed or the weak-minded. And yet, choosing its intelligence analysts from the academic groves of our left-professors, setting them up as cloistered bureaucrats, the U.S. government has brought us intelligence analysis as pandering and a national grand strategy based on wishful thinking. If there is a serious problem in the world, like the future intentions of the ruling Chinese Communist Party in Beijing, you won’t hear a worst-case assessment from the boys at CIA or DIA. These smart fellows know enough to take their lead from American political culture, from their former professors. They derive their epistemology from the shopping mall regime, their ethics from television, and their integrity from politicians. These are the same politicians who don’t want to say that Communists rule China. The “C” word is not to be used. It’s one of those negatives, when closely considered, that might suggest our trade policy with China is stupid and dangerous. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive