About Me

Name:Boris Tiraspolsky
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Our independence, not our interdependence.



"The United Nations is not just, as many Americans suspect, a group of incompetent busybodies. It is, instead, a global criminal enterprise determined to shift power away from individuals and sovereign nation-states to a small band of unaccountable international elites."


U.N. headquarters in New York City

________________________________

Death to the U.N.!
By Joseph Farah

Today is United Nations Day. How shall we celebrate?

Easy. We ought to be mourning the continued life of this globalist monstrosity, not celebrating it. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bin Laden: mujahidins in Iraq committed mistakes

"If one reviews the public statements of Bin Laden, at least since 1996, this would be the first time he would talk about the Jihadists’ mistakes, not the errors by Muslim rulers in general: Now these are his own fighters who are at fault."


______________________________

A Caliph's frustration with his emirs
By Walid Phares
 

Yes, Bin Laden’s latest audiotape aired on al Jazeera is somewhat unique. Not in its ideological party line or in the Salafi doctrinal roots. That hasn’t changed nor is it expected to. Surely, in a previous speech he inserted some neo Marxist and Trotskyite stuff; but that was part of his “American” rhetoric, and possibly at the request of his Gringo advisers. Today’s audio wasn’t concerned about Berkeley’s approval but was dedicated to whip the chaotic commanders of Jihad in Iraq. Usama’s message was more so the expression of a frustrated (self appointed) “Caliph” trying to reign in on his emirs gone wild in the deserts of Middle Earth. The “Lord” is upset with how al Qaeda Iraq has administered the struggle, the people and the image. Incredibly, the number one of al Qaeda said the ????????? “Mujahidins” in Iraq committed ????? “mistakes.” Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ideological Collaborator with Enemy - Nancy Pelosi

American Ideological Society
publicly declares Speaker Nancy Pelosi
Ideological Collaborator with Enemy


Ideological Collaborator with Enemy
U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
_________________________________________________

Definition of
Ideological Collaborator with Enemy
(click here)
_________________________________________________

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The most brilliant political analyst in America


“We have to decide whether we want our children and grandchildren living in a future controlled by bureaucrats and leftist professors or by leaders who respect traditional American values and our remarkable country." - Newt Gongrich


Ideological Warrior of the Nation - Newt Gingrich
(click here)
____________________________

Newt Notes on Freedom in America
By Gordon Bishop 

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich is the most brilliant political analyst in America. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hate speech and Islamic jihad

Sura72:15 “The disbelievers are the firewood of hell.”


Muslim hate is based on the Ideology of the Islamic Law 
_______________________________

Why Islamic Fascists Get Away With Hate Speech
By Mike S. Adams

When, in class one day, a student said that “hate speech” was not free speech, I asked him the following: “Can you even define hate speech?” After a long silence, I assured him that I, too, was unable to define hate speech. But, since then, I think I have come up with a suitable definition that helps me understand both the failure of speech codes and the success of Islamic terrorism. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

U.S. Anti-Terrorist System of Defense

"Predominant majority of buildings - public and private are not secure enough, and there will be an arbitrary number of casualties among civilians at some point of imminent homeland battle with Terror. The Nation is indeed under terrorist siege with systematic and persistent efforts by terrorist-aggressors to attack and destroy defensive structures, economy, and the civilian society of the United States." - Boris Tiraspolsky



European medieval town-fortress
 __________________________________

"My house is my castle"
Historical prototype of U.S. anti-terrorist country-citadel

Earlier period in formation of modern European towns was based on a need for a place to trade, religious holidays, development of crafts, and all sorts of entertainments. However, first and foremost old European towns provided a better security for local populations living in small villages surrounded these towns, while being attacked by enemies, or armed bandits.

European countries being a Historic Stage of incessant wars during two last millenniums developed an architectural and military engineering design of a town surrounded by ramparts, rows of outside and rows of inner walls, towers, battlements, end etc. That was a town-citadel with a main purpose to preserve, protect and defend own local population. 

Old European towns still reflect a need for security of own populations constantly looking for protection against all sorts of evil forces in the past. "Watch towers", east, west, south, north “gates” “walls”, “ramparts", divisions on "upper town", “lower town", “cities” along with narrow street passages are live rudiments of common fortifications of the past. 

There is another typical detail in the design of historic parts of old European towns: almost every house was constructed as a small "fortress" of its own. And every house in town-citadel was a small "castle". The paramount of security in old European town-citadels was inner city and/or castle of Sovereign also surrounded by protective walls. 

Locations for inner cities and/or sovereign’s castles were usually chosen on a high hill or a cliff. They were separate “impregnable” fortresses within town-citadels. Inner cities and castles were surrounded with highest walls and towers, had an independent supply of provisions and water, and, of course, additional shelters for people needed protection.

U.S. homeland battle with Terror compels to imitate the described above old-fashioned model of European town-citadel, but expanding it to the entire North American realm. The whole country has to be looked at as one anti-terrorist citadel capable to withstand a long term unconventional terrorist siege warfare with potential use of Weapons of Mass Destruction against the U.S. population. (Read more...) 

The modern terrorist warfare with extraordinary siege of entire states calls for U.S. Anti-Terrorist System with a layer of lines of anti-terrorist defense.  That  requires developing suitable extended contra-siege fortifications and comprehensive contra-siege techniques necessary for creation of a gigantic anti-terrorist “country-citadel“. (Read more...) 

It is possible that some lines of the U.S. anti-terrorist System of Defense may fail. It is also possible that some of them may be not perfect enough, and new more perfect anti-terrorist lines of defense will be developed in the future. However, it is categorically wrong and impracticable not to have them at all in battle with Terror on the American soil. 

Boris Tiraspolsky
Founding Member of 

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Art of Survival After Explosion of WMD


Five rules of survival everyone must know and share with others


The rest is your knowledge and responsibility
___________________________________________________________

Five Useful Rules of Survival for the First 100 Minutes After 
Explosion of Weapons of Mass Destruction

Continued...

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ideological attack by actor Sean Penn

It's a country [Iraq] of human beings
whose lives that were once oppressed by Saddam are
now in Dante's Inferno."  -
Sean Penn


Sean Penn is an accomplished actor,
and he is skillfully using basic Ideological Instruments of Performing Arts
to impact minds of the American people not to fight Terror. 
Listen  Hear an excerpt of Penn’s anti-anti-terrorist war speech 


Among other basic Ideological Instruments that Sean Penn is
utilizing in his powerful ideological attack against the War on Terror are 
the comparison of Iraq with Inferno of Divine Comedy by
great Italian poet Dante Alliguery (1265 -1321)

Image:Dante-alighieri.jpg
Dante painted by Giotto

Divine Comedy by Dante is considered to be
the greatest ever written poetic work in the history of the Western Civilization.
It is a poem of a human courage and dream of the "more perfect" Future that
is directly related to an idea of everlasting peace, prosperity, and joy of
the Golden Age of the Mankind. 

Read more... 

When Sean Penn compares the current situation in Iraq with Dante's Inferno, 
he automatically turnes "useful" Dante's poetry against himself.   
As a true masterpiece, Dante's Inferno opens a prospective for
a better life for the Mankind. 
In contrast, total terrorist warfare has only prospective of
a total annihilation of the Mankind.
 ____________________________________


Sean Penn in Iran

Do these people on the photograph care about vanishing Dante's Divine Comedy?
They do not. 
What about you, Mr. Sean Penn?
 ______________________________________


"Useful" Illustration by Gustav Dore, Inferno, Stanza I 

"In a midway of the mortal life of mine
I lost my way within a forest dark,
And a pathway out I could never find."

Dante, Divine Comedy, Inferno, Stanza I
"Useful" poetic translation by Boris Tiraspolsky

There is "a pathway out", Mr. Sean Penn.
Read Dante's Divine Comedy.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I fear for our nation's future

U.S. Ideological Civil War - To fight or not to fight Terror
(click here)

"Useful Art" of a political cartoon

______________________________________

A big problem for Democrats
by Joseph Farah
 

A ranking Democrat has finally admitted what we all should have realized.

The worst nightmare for part of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid would be victory for the U.S. in Iraq.
 
In an interview with the Washington Post, James Clyburn, D-South Carolina and the House Democratic whip, was asked what his party would do if Gen. David Patraeus reports in September that the surge strategy is working very, very well.

"Well, that would be a real big problem for us, no question about that," said Clyburn. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Historical Models of Modern Anti-Terrorist Fortifications


Two original historical models in building wall fortifications:


The Great Wall of China - beautiful Instrument of "useful Art"  
and another historic model of fortifications left by 
the vanished Empire of Evil - Soviet Union


The Berlin Wall "beautified" with graffiti - ugly Instrument of the Cold War 
___________________________________

What do Tijuana, Baghdad and Jerusalem have in common? They all have walls that divide neighbors, cause controversy and form part of an array of physical barriers around the world that dwarf the late, unlamented Iron Curtain. There are walls, fences, trenches and berms. Some are reinforced by motion detectors, heat-sensing cameras, X-ray systems, night-vision equipment, helicopters, drones and blimps. Some are still under construction, some in the planning stage. When completed, the barriers will run thousands of miles, in places as far apart as Mexico and India, Afghanistan and Spain, Morocco and Thailand, Malaysia and Saudi Arabia, and Iraq. When completed, the barriers will run thousands of miles, in places as far apart as Mexico and India, Afghanistan and Spain, Morocco and Thailand, Malaysia and Saudi Arabia, and Iraq. They are meant to keep job-hungry immigrants, terrorists and smugglers out, thwart invaders, and keep antagonists apart. Their proponents cite the proverb "Good fences make good neighbors" but critics say they are a paradoxical result of globalization in so far as goods and capital can move freely but migrants cannot. By an irony of history, the United States -- the country that hastened the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 -- has emerged as a champion wall builder. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bin Laden Asks Iraq Insurgents to Unite


"Every American man is an enemy to us." 


Osama bin Laden, Islamic jihad leader 
________________________

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

U.S. as Anti-Terrorist Country-Citadel

"We can sum it up in one sentence: Our technical civilization has just reached its greatest level of savagery. We will have to choose, in the more or less near future, between collective suicide and the intelligent use of our scientific conquests....... This is no longer a prayer but a demand to be made by all peoples to their governments -- a demand to choose definitively between hell and reason." - Albert Camus 


Nuclear weapons are one of Instruments of Terror and mass destruction
in modern total terrorist warfare   
__________________________________

United States as Anti-Terrorist Country-Citadel

Permanent fortifications turning the United States into anti-terrorist Country-Citadel and American towns into modern fortresses armed with strategic anti-terrorist Ideological and Economic Weaponries are imperative in terrorist total siege warfare. (Read more...)  They will finally end the ongoing all-National hostage crisis, and protect U.S. cities, towns, villages against terrorist attacks with  both conventional weapons and Weapons of Mass Destruction. 

Unfortunately, all U.S. programs concerned with threats of possible attacks with Weapons of Mass Destruction have been always the subject of controversy in the past. For instance, plans to evacuate large cities populations to rural areas in case of attacks with nuclear arms were totally abandoned in the early 1980s in the United States. These plans were rejected by many state and city governments as “unfeasible and unrealistic”. 

There is no doubt, that the very concept of the United States as anti-terrorist Country-Citadel set with permanent fortifications and arms necessary for survival of the Nation will just add more oil into almost extinguished fire of old controversy linked to analogous survival programs dumped in the United States in the early 1980s. It is quite predictable that the idea of anti-terrorist Ideological and Economic Weaponries described in this work earlier is not going to be enthusiastically and easy received in the United States either. 

Some may passionately argue that the concept of Country-Citadel armed with anti-terrorist Ideological and Economic Weaponries, is “unfeasible and unrealistic” too. They may also wrangle that all these anti-terrorist strategic arms and permanent fortifications are as much useless for the United States, as the abandoned survival programs in the past. 

These concerned voices have a sound point: no “nuclear catastrophe” has happened in the United States in the end. Therefore, the strongest argument they may use is that all big efforts and all big money that could have been spent on “futile” survival programs in the past would have been foolishly wasted. It is hard to disagree with this observation too. 

Even so, one should become aware of a great deal of difference between the early 1980s and nowadays. The early 1980s were “old good times” of the Cold War with effective deterring Instruments that made usage of Weapons of Mass Destruction just theoretical threats. Can the very same Instruments discourage terrorists from their attacks against the United States now? No, they cannot. Terrorists openly and publicly unleashed their objectives to “wipe out from the World Map” entire states and nations. 

Can anyone in a right mind guarantee that terrorists-aggressors are not going to make use of Weapons of Mass Destruction, if they get them? No one can assure that every single terrorist act is going to be detected and prevented in the future either. Accordingly, terrorist attacks with Weapons of Mass Destruction against the United States are not “just theoretical threats” anymore. They are only a matter of “what”, “when”, and “where”. 

The concept of the United States as Country-Citadel and American Towns as fortrsses set with advanced permanent fortifications and armed with strategic anti-terrorist Ideological and Economic Weaponries derives from an extreme need to defend lives of U.S. civilians, cultural values, and material supplies in “life or death” battle with Terror on the American soil. Turning the United States into anti-terrorist Country-Citadel is a must to “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”.

Boris Tiraspolsky
Founding Member of 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Are we stuck?

"America can be attacked anonymously. The enemies of America know this to be true; therefore they want nuclear weapons technology to spread throughout the world." 

 

The Logic of Nuclear Proliferation
by J. R. Nyquist

We can look back and see the past. But who can see the future? The way ahead is often very different than we imagine. The past is firmly set, known to memory and accessible to reflection. The future, into which we plunge day to day, is a question mark. We crave certainty about the future. We seek answers that will calm our fears and reassure our hopes. To this end men and women throughout history have sought the advice of astrologers, seers and psychics. They have consulted oracles. On the more scientific side the quantifiers have measured increases and decreases in population, wealth and opinion, sometimes giving the impression that change advances continuously and steadily in the same direction. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ideological Warrior of the Nation - Joseph Farah


"It's time to fight for something worthwhile –
not just the preserving of freedom,
but the expansion of freedom."
 
Preview Image
Joseph Farah is founder, editor and CEO of
WorldNetDaily and a nationally syndicated columnist



Continued...

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ideological Collaborator with Enemy - George Soros

"I give away something up to $500 million a year throughout the world promoting Open Society. My foundations support people in the country who care about an open society. It's their work that I'm supporting. So it's not me doing it."


George Soros - Ideological Promoter and Financial Backer of Open Society
 _________________________

George Soros: The Man, The Mind And The Money Behind MoveOn
 

The Left: The smear ad published against Gen. Petraeus has drawn attention to its sponsor, MoveOn.org. But the fingerprints of the group's chief financial backer, George Soros, were all over it. Who is this man and what is he up to? Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive