About Me

Name:Boris Tiraspolsky
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

The world's leading anti-democratic force

"Muslims can modernize their religion, but that requires major changes: Out go waging jihad to impose Muslim rule, second-class citizenship for non-Muslims and death sentences for blasphemy or apostasy. In come individual freedoms, civil rights, political participation, popular sovereignty, equality before the law and representative elections."


Daniel Pipes.
Director of the Middle East Forum and the Taube/Diller
Distinguished Visiting Fellow at the Hoover Institution of Stanford University
_______________________________________

Islam and democracy can coexist
By Daniel Pipes

There's an impression that Muslims suffer disproportionately from the rule of dictators, tyrants, unelected presidents, kings, emirs and various other strongmen - and it's accurate. A careful analysis by Frederic L. Pryor of Swarthmore College in the Middle East Quarterly (Are Muslim Countries Less Democratic?) concludes, "In all but the poorest countries, Islam is associated with fewer political rights." Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ignoring the totalitarian ideology of Islamism

"...pattern of U.S. concessions to global Islamism bears the clear and unambiguous message of the U.S. government's "surrender" to the global forces of Islamism. In effect, the current U.S. administration is telling Islamists that America is already tired of fighting, and that Islamists can go about their efforts to control the world as long as they do it peacefully."



Who is America Fighting - Jihadists or Extremists?
By Jeffrey Imm

Now we officially know the answer - the U.S. Government states that America is definitely not fighting "jihadists", based on new guidelines directing federal agencies not to even use the term "jihadist". So who is America fighting? Defense Secretary Robert Gates tells us: "the enemy is extremism". Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The meaningless war with words

Comment by Boris Tiraspolsky: Here is a passage from another recent bureaucratic attempt of the U.S. Government to combat Terrorism ideologically: "Language is critical in the war on terror, says another [U.S. Government] doc-ument, an internal "official use only" memorandum circulating through Washington entitled "Words that Work and Words that Don't: A War guide for Counterterrorism Communication."

I am positive that the problem is not in the "language" the U.S. Government uses, or more precisely bans to use. And never has been! The problem is a lack of appropriate U.S. Ideological Instruments - anti-terrorist Education, anti-terrorist PR, that is in fact the Instrument of anti-terrorist propaganda, and anti-terrorist "useful Arts" (Read more...). This very problem creates a confusion in what "ideological struggle" is and turns the latter in the meaningless "war with words" replacing necessary war with "wrong ideologies" and "ideology of no ideology". 



'Jihadist' booted from government lexicon

By MATTHEW LEE 
 
Don't call them jihadists any more. And don't call al-Qaida a movement. The Bush administration has launched a new front in the war on terrorism, this time targeting language. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

War on Terror - bureaucratic view

Comment by Boris Tiraspolsky: I usually make my comments after a quote. This time it is an exception. Mr. Juan Zarate, deputy national security advisor for combating terrorism said: "We know the War on Terror -- with its embedded struggle against a violent extremist ideology -- is a generational calling that requires the entire U.S. government and the international community to act." This is a common position of the current Administration. It is a typical view that contradicts both a general theory of modern warfare and goes against the nature of the War on Terror that requires first and foremost an unprecedented ideological and economic cooperation of the U.S. Government with the American people who are currently totally armless in "struggle against a violent extremist ideology". (Read more...) Without this ideological and economic unity of the Government and the People of the United States there is no victory in battle with Terror, and all wonderful words about winning the War on Terror by Mr. Juan Zarate turn into another bureaucratic "hot air".
 


Juan Zarate, deputy national security advisor for combating terrorism

Winning the War on Terror:
Marking Success and Confronting Challenges

On April 23, 2008, Juan Zarate, deputy national security advisor for combating terrorism, addressed The Washington Institute's Special Policy Forum. The following is the text of his prepared remarks. 

Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Economic faze of terrorist warfare

"...any weak spot in production of basic material necessities by the National Economy could be taken advantage of with a price manipulation at a time of peace, and a potential threat of using lack of basic material necessities as Economic Weaponry against nations and states at a time of war." - Boris Tiraspolsky 
Terrorist Economic Weaponry



The Soaring Price of Oil and Terrorism
By Victor Comras

A few days ago, when oil was just $115.00 per barrel, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad declared that the price of oil was still “unrealistically low,” and that “Oil … needs to discover its real value." And, within a few days the market seemed to comply driving the price up to $120.00 per barrel! The effects of this spiraling oil price on the US and world economy has been staggering, and the impact will continue to be intensified as the price of oil works its way through the international economic system. Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups could never had imagined that events they set off at the turn of the millennium could ever have caused such oil dislocation and demand around the world. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pure terrorist propaganda

"To try and describe USA vs. Al-Arian as a doc-umentary is to attempt to change the definition of the word. It is pure propaganda, made only to show a family of Palestinian extremists in a good light."


Terrorist Cries and Lies
 
By Joe Kaufman

The movie USA vs. Al-Arian, about the trial of Palestinian Islamic Jihad leader Sami Al-Arian, has been released to the public via the internet. Its producers refer to it as a “doc-umentary.” That is just as much of a fable as the way the terrorist’s family has been portrayed in the film. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The U.S. and Israel must learn now

"When Israel's ideology will collapse, and after we take Jerusalem, Israel's ideology will collapse altogether, and then we will proceed with out own ideology, if Allah wills, and we will throw them out of all of Palestine."


No good guys in 'Palestine'

by
Why does the U.S. government continue to promote the creation of an independent state of Palestine, which has never existed in the history of the world, which is born of terrorist violence and which is pledged to the destruction of Israel? Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Iran must not acquire nuclear weapons

"I said a year and a half ago that the year is 1938 and Iran is Germany and it is racing to acquire nuclear weapons. Well, if that is the case, then we’re in 1939 now."


Benjamin Netanyahu

In the midst of two great transformations in the world
by Benjamin Netanyahu

Right now we’re in the midst of two great transformations in the world. The first one, I believe, is positive. The second one is negative. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

God of peace, bring your peace to our violent world

Pope Benedict XVI began the final day of his American journey by blessing the site of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and pleading with God to bring "peace to our violent world."



Pope's Prayer At Ground Zero

O God of love, compassion, and healing,
look on us, people of many different faiths and traditions,
who gather today at this site,
the scene of incredible violence and pain. 

Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Abridging the freedom of speech

"...critics of Islam sometimes push the envelope of good taste. Other times they cross it, thus damaging their own cause. Governments, however, should keep to the sidelines and let the marketplace of ideas play itself out to the greatest extent possible."


Critics of Islam Face the Speech Police
By R. John Matthies
  
Ravaged by cancer, journalist Oriana Fallaci summoned her remaining strength in 2005 and 2006 to battle a cancer ravaging the West: censorship. Sadly, she did not live long enough to defend herself against the charges of "defaming Islam" that had been leveled against her by an Italian court. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Major strategic blow on American power

The 1983 U.S. Embassy bombing was a suicide bombing against the United States Embassy in Beirut, Lebanon on April 18, 1983 that killed over 60 people.



Remembering the Beirut Embassy Bombing:
April 18, 1983

Twenty-five years ago today a late model GMC truck packed with explosives slammed into the U.S. Embassy in Beirut and crashing through the lobby door. In his memoir See No Evil former CIA operative Robert Baer, who devoted much of this career to identifying the perpetrators of the bombing, “Even by Beirut standards, it was an enormous blast…” Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Let's not declare allegiance with the enemies

"Good Americans can and should have a free and lively debate about how best to protect our country and expand freedom around the world. But good people – good Americans – don't characterize the U.S. as "a murderous empire that has killed 1 million civilians in Iraq alone." That's what bad people do."



Off the deep end

by
Ideological Warrior of the Nation - Joseph Farah
 
Sometimes I wonder if America can continue to govern itself as a free nation endowed with certain unalienable rights by its Creator. Too many Americans, including some with great minds, have lost their bearings – lots all perspective on right and wrong, good and evil. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (24) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Severe credibility problem

"Islamic countries passed this [U.N] resolution to protect religion from hatred and intolerance, then they and their motion have a severe credibility problem. "



The United Nations: Islam’s Gestapo
 
By Stephen Brown

Nepotism, corruption, anti-Semitism and now censorship.
 
While the United Nations has disgraced itself over the years with sporadic eruptions of the first three negatives, it added another one last March 28 when its Human Rights Council passed a disturbing resolution that directs the body’s expert on free speech to report on “individuals and news media for negative comments on Islam.” In effect, the UN will now become the Islamic world’s censorship watchdog, snooping out undefined acts of Islamophobia around the globe. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

American academia, a complicity of silence

"...at George Washington and countless other schools across the country, groups ranging from the Muslim Students Association to the College Democrats – to even the College Republicans – have been unwilling to condemn these and other affirmations of hatred when they concern Islamic militants."





GW Students Refuse To Condemn Genocide
 
By FrontPage Magazine

When George Washington University senior Sergio Gor tried to get campus student groups to sign a Declaration Against Genocide last week, he thought it would be a no-brainer. Who, after all, wouldn't support a statement endorsing such uncontroversial tenets as the "right of all people to live in freedom and dignity," the equal dignity of men and women, and the freedom of conscience? Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Defeat of Ideology of no Ideology

"Among a few unlucky words in the American political vocabulary the word IDEOLOGY is perhaps the unluckiest one."



Why the Nation is armless in struggle with ideological enemies
by Boris Tiraspolsky

In his article 'Day of Reckoning': A Review of Pat Buchanan's Latest Book' Tony Blankley writes: "As my friend always does in his books, brother Patrick combines shrewd analysis and his own crisp and passionate words with wonderful quotes from others. He quotes George Orwell's observation that "ideology animates 'the streamlined men who think in slogans and talk in bullets.'" That description remains as fresh as this evening's cable political talk shows and news reports. I cite that quote because, for me, one of the strongest elements in "Day of Reckoning" is Buchanan's remorseless assault on ideology -- whether being used by imperialists, free traders or cultural manipulators. This may sound surprising to some because these days, many people both on the left and right proudly support their respective ideologies. But like Buchanan, I was educated in an age when conservatives proudly asserted that conservatism was, by definition, the absence of ideology. Ideology was -- and remains -- the product of intellectuals who substitute for the wisdom of the ages, the organic unfolding of their institutions, the teachings of their faith and common sense their own fanatical belief that their ideas can (in Russell Kirk's words) convert our world "into a terrestrial paradise through the operation of positive law and positive planning." Or as Pat writes: "Ideology has one foot grounded in reality, but the other is ever on quicksand. For no one can know the future. Yet the True Believer has moral certitude, for his ideology foretells a future certain to come if the sacrifices are sufficient and the anointed leaders are faithfully followed." And with that bit in his teeth, Pat runs riot through the ideologies of free trade, Bushian wars-for-democracy arguments and open borders theories. It is not only honest, solid historic reporting but also splendid, angryprose." 

The following is not a review on the review by Tony Blankley. The quote from the article by Tony Blankley clearly defines three major general categories of the American people:
 
1. Those who minds are being infiltrated with “wrong ideologies“;
2. Those who are preaching “ideology of no ideology”;
3. Those who are choosing between “wrong ideologies” and “ideology of no ideology”.
 
I tend to think that this definition is more precise then a simple and commonly accepted division on "liberals" and "conservatives".

The only problem is that neither of the defined above categories of the American people is able to develop superior anti-terrorist Ideological Instruments, nor become Ideological Force necessary for “ideological struggle of the 21st century” - global battle with Islamic jihadists waged total war against the United States. (Read more...)
 
Among a few unlucky words in the American political vocabulary the word IDEOLOGY is perhaps the unluckiest one. A recent book by Pat Buchanan just adds another drop in already full basket of negative connotations related to the word IDEOLOGY.
 
The problem of misunderstanding and misinterpreting the word IDEOLOGY by the American intellectuals and consequently by the majority of the American people results in a lack of general ideological awareness of the Nation. Consequently, it causes the current ideological defeat of the United States in global battle with Terror.

Let me define again the word IDEOLOGY. “The original meaning of the word “ideology” is “the Science of ideas and ideals“. Ideology specifically identifies practical usage of ideas that originate from the Progress of human Ethics - principles of moral conduct, and Esthetics - perception of beauty and ugliness. Needless to stress that both, Ethics and Esthetics are literally shaping a civilized society.” (Read more...)

There is no doubt that a massive misuse of “principles of moral conduct” and abuse of “perception of beauty and ugliness” in the modern History are among major contributors to a negative perception related to the word IDEOLOGY.

However, misusing and abusing Ethics and Esthetics have nothing to do with IDEOLOGY, but with men lacking PRINCIPLES of Ethics and Esthetics, and more precisely - absolute Ethics and perfect Esthetics.
 
For anyone who still thinks that such PRINCIPLES do not exist I highly recommend to read works by Abraham Lincoln and the text of the Constitution of the United States being a full embodiment of absolute Ethics and perfect Esthetics for the last more then 200 years.

The latter makes the Constitution of the United States the most powerful Ideological Instrument of the modern History in battle with Terror (Read more... ), and the People of the United States responsible for the further Progress of the Ideology of the U.S. Constitution. (Read more...)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive