About Me

Name: Boris Tiraspolsky
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Encourage our enemies

"...the various steps Mr. Obama is taking with respect to the armed forces, the foreign battlefields in which they are engaged, our allies as well as our adversaries will not only diminish our power. They will encourage our enemies to perceive us as less powerful - with ominous implications."

 

GAFFNEY: Our enemies sense weakness
Frank J. Gaffney Jr.

COMMENTARY:
President Obama's stewardship of the national security portfolio to date amounts to a wrecking operation, a set of policies he must understand will not only weaken the United States but embolden our foes. After all, the communist agitator Saul Alinsky, a formative influence in Mr. Obama's early years as a “community organizer,” made the following Rule No. 1 in his 1971 book “Rules for Radicals” — “Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.”  Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Former British PM Tony Blair said...

"There is essentially one battle going on, and it is a battle about Islam."
 

Former British PM Tony Blair

Former British PM Tony Blair said:
  "There are two elements in Islam: one wanted to work with the West; the other did not. We just have to work with the one that wants to work with the West."

Comment by Jihad Watch: Of course! Why didn't anyone think of that before?

Anything in his talk about why the "extremists" are so popular, or is that assumed to be a simple matter of policy and reaction to Western foreign policy? Did Blair even get close to mentioning the fact that there is a traditional, deeply rooted idea in Islamic texts and teachings, that Muslims must wage war against and subjugate unbelievers -- regardless of what those unbelievers have done or not done? I am sure that he didn't, despite its relevance to his point.

But until analysts grapple with that fact, nothing is more certain than that the global jihad will continue, no matter which smiling moderate is feted in Western capitals today.

Comment by Boris Tiraspolsky: "Recognition of Art of Deception as the "jihadists with sword" way of life is a vital step toward anti-terrorist ideological awareness of the Nation. It is also necessary for emerging new realistic U.S. Global War on Terror Strategy and consequently, Operational Art capable of thwarting enemy’s Art of Deception by the anti-terrorist “totality of maneuvers and battles” - military, economic, ideological."  - Operational Art of Modern Terrorist Warfare
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We would like to be a nation of aristocrats

"Today’s ideological gurus and demagogues talk of a “great society” or eliminating poverty. We have our “war against drugs” and all that nonsense about educating everybody. Oh yes, we would like to be a nation of aristocrats. Americans pick crops? No way. Bring in the Mexicans to do it! Does work have dignity? No way. Let the Chinese work. Americans will buy and buy, shopping until they are dropping."



Creative Visualization 101
by J. R. Nyquist

Self-help books have become popular in America. These books pose numerous questions. One such question asks, “Where do you want to be in three years, five years, or ten years?” The question immediately fixates on two things: (1) What you want (2) according to a timetable. Anything is possible. You can be whatever you want and do whatever you want. There is a problem with this approach to life, however. “Where do you want to be in ninety years?” Answer honestly, and everything comes into sharper focus. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

To bring on the end of America

"In economic policy, through regulation and control of energy output, financial services and monetary expansion, the U.S. government has embarked on a fundamental reshaping of America. It is designed, in short, to bring on the end of America."
 


U.S. law-making is riddled with slapdh, incompetence and gamesmanship
By Terence Corcoran

Helicopter Ben Bernanke’s Federal Reserve is dropping trillions of fresh paper dollars on the world economy, the President of the United States is cracking jokes on late night comedy shows, his energy minister is threatening a trade war over carbon emissions, his treasury secretary is dithering over a banking reform program amid rising concerns over his competence and a monumentally dysfunctional U.S. Congress is launching another public jihad against corporations and bankers. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

If Obama was the President in 1941

The White House official web site published the following: "President Obama released a special video message for all those celebrating Nowruz. Translated "New Day," Nowruz marks the arrival of spring and the beginning of the New Year for millions in Iran and other [Muslim] communities around the world.  This year, the President wanted to send a special message to the people and government of Iran on Nowruz, acknowledging the strain in our relations over the last few decades. "But at this holiday we are reminded of the common humanity that binds us together," he says."



Obama in place of FDR, 1941
by Boris Tiraspolsky

I have  imagined what would had President Obama said, if he would had been in the White House in 1941. For that I have not changed the Obama's message of March 20, 2009.  I have only taken a liberty to replace all references about the Islamic Republic of Iran to Nazi Germany. Let me just remind you the major events of 1941: German forces invaded Greece and Yugoslavia, attacked Crete. On June 22, 1941 German forces invaded Russia. On March 20, 1941 the United States was still a neutral country in the ongoing World War II. Almost nine months left before the attack on the Pearl Harbor. So, here is the President's message. No comments! Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Enforcement of immigration laws is "un-American"

"Illegal immigrants are in millions all lover the United States... For the last two decades illegal immigration in the United States has grown into an unmanageable National problem of a Biblical proportion. At this point no one really knows how many illegal immigrants are in the country! The numbers vary from a conservative official estimate of 11 million to unofficial number of more then 20 million. In reality, the total figure of illegal immigrants most likely is much greater than the official estimate." -  Boris Tiraspolsky
(click here)

Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi said:
 "Who in this country would not want to change a policy of kicking in doors in the middle of the night and sending a parent [illegal immigrants] away from their families? It must be stopped....What value system is that? I think it's un-American. I think it's un-American. We have to have a change in policy and practice and again ... I can't say enough, the raids  must end. The raids must end. You [illegal immigrants] are special people. You're here on a Saturday night to take responsibility for our country's future. That makes you [illegal immigrants]very, very patriotic."

Comment by Rick Oltman, Californians for Population Stabilization: "I was embarrassed by what she [Nancy Pelosi]  said. Exhorting illegal aliens for taking responsibility for our country's future.... In fact, sitting there in the audience.... I really resented that comment. I think it was pandering to the crowd but also insulting to American citizens who consider themselves to be patriotic, who obey the rule of law."
 
Comment by Patrick J. Buchanan: "As for Ms. Pelosi & Co., they seem determined to prove the point that, no matter the failures of Bush & Co., the Democrats are unfit for command."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

U.S. Ideological Civil War or Cold Civil War?

A writer William Gibson is famous for inventing the word "cyberspace," way back in 1982. In his latest novel, Spook Country, he is inventing another striking term - "A cold civil war".


"Useful" novel by William Gibson

Quotation from novel Spook Country by William Gibson:

Alejandro looked over his knees. "Carlito said there is a war in America."

"A war?"

"A civil war."

"There is no war, Alejandro, in America."

"When grandfather helped found the DGI, in Havana, were the Americans at war with the Russians?"

"That was the 'cold war.' "

Alejandro nodded, his hands coming up to grip his knees. "A cold civil war."

Comment by Boris Tiraspolsky:

The term "a cold civil war." invented by William Gibson is missing a very important point. The Nation is currently at Ideological Civil War. The difference is crucial.

A Cold War is the war of deterring with just a theoretical possibility to be turned into a hot confrontation. 

An Ideological Civil War is an incessant battle for hearts and minds of the American people. 

The current U.S. Ideological Civil War is a direct result of ideological immaturity of the predominant majority of the American people refusing to accept the reality of ideological Battle and personal responsibility to "preserve, protect and defend" absolute Ethics and perfect Esthetics of the Constitution of the United States in every day life from ideological enemies of the Nation and their domestic collaborators.  

A defeat in the U.S. Ideological Civil War means a triumph of "wrong ideologies" and may cause a political, economic, social and cultural destruction of the existing U-nion and loss of the National Sovereignty.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Movement loyal to a sitting President

Comment by Boris Tiraspolsky: I recently wrote a few articles dedicated to organizing  by Democrats a political organization loyal personally to President Obama. Here they are: Obama's personal Ideological ForceA deliberate strategy by the White HouseTo avoid chaos, confusion and civil war and Organizing for America and Unity '09 vs. GOP. I am pleased that the article by Lona Manning is also concerned about "a new organization on the political scene -- "Organizing for America," announced by President Barack Obama". Thanks to Lona Manning and her article I am not alone in jumping to my alarming conclusion anymore.        



The Knock on the Door
By Lona Manning

A sitting President of the United States is "organizing a political organization loyal to him, bound by a pledge, outside the government and existing party apparatus. The historical precedents are ominous." Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We voted for the best storyteller in the bar!

"And true to his Irish heritage, Obama has spent a lifetime offering perhaps the greatest list of astounding shams ever told..."


Best Irish poet ever?
By Tom Adkins

For centuries, Ireland graced the world with poets, writers and musicians, from Yeats to Ó Sandair to Heaney to Lynott who, with a mere twist of a syllable, a clever dash of sarcasm, a tear or three and a smile or two, made us giggle, cry, croon or swoon, sometimes in the same sentence. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Marxism is a science. It is not.

"When a Marxist speaks of "dictatorship of the proletariat," he means he thinks he has the right to use violence to impose his own arbitrary dictatorship upon members of the working class and upon everyone else, without asking for their approval or votes."



What is Marxism?
By Steven Plaut
 
Marxists claim that Marxism is a science.  It is not.  It is a sort of pagan religious cult.  It is a theology.  It is a form of superstition. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The country needs to wake up

"Panarin is saying, basically, that the present economic crisis signals a political crisis. The divisions within American society, and the narcissistic pathologies of consumer society, will cause an implosion. The people of America will turn against one another. The protective nuclear umbrella provided by the United States will cease to function. Europe and Asia will fall to Russia and China."


Igor Panarin,
dean of the Russian Foreign Ministry’s diplomatic academy
________________________________________________

Chaos, Confusion, and Civil War
by J. R. Nyquist

On 29 December 2008 the Wall Street Journal ran a piece about Igor Panarin, dean of the Russian Foreign Ministry’s diplomatic academy. A former KGB officer, Panarin made a splash by predicting that America will probably come under martial law by the end of 2009, and may fracture into several states by 2011. When this happens, says Panarin, Russia and China will become the mainstays of a new global order. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Organizing for America and Unity '09 vs. GOP

"...a broad coalition of left-leaning groups—including MoveOn, the ACLU the National Council of La Raza and Planned Parenthood—is quietly closing ranks into a new coalition, "Unity '09," aimed at helping President Barack Obama push pressure lawmakers in their home states to back White House legislation and other progressive causes."



Obama's United Ideological Force vs. GOP
by Boris Tiraspolsky
 
The website POLITICO published two alarming articles Post-Rush: Obama's message war and Unity '09: Dem groups quietly align. Both articles are dedicated to the very same subject I wrote about in my resent publication Obama's personal Ideological Force
 
I hate to repeat myself, but here is a quote from that publication: “Is anyone out were who is intelligent enough to understands that this is U.S. Ideological Civil War for Fate of the Nation? This war cannot be won without knowing your enemy and having superior Ideological Instruments and Forces. Barack Obama and his fellow Democrats seem to understand that well. They do know the Power of Ideology first hand. They won the election by using that Power.”  

In my another article A deliberate strategy by the White House I wrote: “The true “deliberate strategy of the White House” and the Democratic Party is to continue doing anything possible to diminish a role of the Republican Party in life of the Nation. Democrats will try to make the GOP irrelevant for the future of the American people.
  
By some hardly understandable reason… most prominent, influential and highly intellectual Republicans either do not see it, or reluctant to admit that eventually the Democrat’s “deliberate strategy” calls for a total annihilation of the Republican Party as an opposition Force.”

Here is one more quote from my article To avoid chaos, confusion and civil war : “The Republican Party must take the following five steps to "preserve, protect and defend" the practical ideas and ideals of conservatism and the Constitution of the United States:

Step 1. The Republican party needs to reassess a role of the Democratic Party and to recognize it as the Party of "wrong ideology": political, economic, social and cultural, representing interests of Bureaucracies - Federal, State, Local and all those who support these Bureaucracies.

Step 2. The Republican Party needs to take an initiative in introducing widely the Ideology of the U.S. Constitution to be as Abraham Lincoln said "the political religion of the nation", representing interests of the People of the United States.

Step 3. The Republican Party needs to redefine own role from just an Instrument utilized for an election process to become a united Ideological Leader of the Nation, political, economic, social. cultural - the Party of Ideology of the Constitution of the United States.

Step 4. The Republican Party needs to form and establish own Ideological Force of Public Instructors functioning on a permanent bases all year around in every municipality of the country; the Public Instructors must promote the Ideological Platform of the Republican Party: merge of conservative views and absolute Ethics and Perfect Esthetics of the U.S. Constitution for grassroots supporters, all interested parties and general population.

Step 5. The Republican Party needs to develop working superior Ideological Instruments in ongoing ideological Battle with "wrong ideology" of the Democratic Party; these Ideological Instruments include Education and Training for rank and file Members of the Republican Party, ideologically charged PR and "useful Arts" - more specifically Useful Performing Arts advancing the Ideological Platform of the Republican Party.”

The above quoted my articles, regardless of how good they may sound and how profound these ideas may be, must be digested by the Republican Leadership, first, and then implemented as an integral part of the GOP’s strategy to influence hearts and minds of the American people.  Otherwise, we may "find ourselves in the midst of chaos, confusion and civil war".
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ideological Role Models of Barack Obama

The Mighty Power obtained by Barack Obama from the comic book superhero Superman: "So I make a solemn pledge to you, as president we will be out of Iraq".


Barack Obama and his role model Superman, a comic book superhero, originally created by American writer Jerry Siegel and Canadian artist Joe Shuster.

Comment by Boris Tiraspolsky: The American people should appreciate that Superman is the Barack Obama's role model. Thank God, it is not  Bogeyman or Binky Brown, for instance. However, can anyone imagine George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Ronald Reagan having a role model from a comic book? Frankly, I cannot.
 
Barack Obama about his another ideological role model Jesse Jackson: 
“I owe him a great debt. I would not be here had it not been for 1984 . . . for 1988. If I’m on the cover of Ebony (an African-American magazine), it’s not because of me. It’s because a whole bunch of folks did the work to put me there.”


Ideological Collaborator with Enemy - Jesse Jackson
(click here)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A new aristocracy walks among us

"The United States have developed a gigantic system of Federal, State and Local Bureaucracies. This bureaucratic structure consists of millions “pen pushers” that fall into three major categories: elected officials, appointed administrators, and so-called “career bureaucrats“. - Boris Tiraspolsky
Growing Power of U.S. Bureaucracies 
 


The New American Class Structure
By Thomas Lifson
 
A new aristocracy walks among us. The formerly enormous middle class that dominated the American social structure for most of a century is crumbling before our eyes, as retirement accounts and home equity evaporate, while health care costs continue to grow inexorably by nearly 10 percent a year. In the face of rising unemployment and tumbling personal net worth, life has gotten much riskier for a vast swath of the American populace. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A deliberate strategy by the White House

“No, Limbaugh is not the head of the Republican Party; he’s a radio personality. It's like saying does Chris Matthews help or hurt the Democratic Party? The fact is he has a large audience, he--the audience believes him, the audience calls their members, the audience has an effect. He's (Limbaugh) not the leader of the Republican party. And Michael Steele's one of the leaders. Bobby Jindal, who you had on recently, is one of the leaders. Sarah Palin's one of the leaders. Eric Cantor's a rising new leader. Paul Ryan's a--I mean, there are tons of leaders in the Republican Party. It is a deliberate strategy by the White House.”


 Ideological Warrior of the Nation - Newt Gingrich 

Newt Gingrich said: "I think what they did with the whole Rush Limbaugh thing - they can't defend signing the 9,000 earmarks, they can't defend an energy-tax increase, they can't defend [Treasury Secretary Timothy F.] Geithner's failure to pay his income taxes, so they decide, 'Let's have a fight over Rush Limbaugh.' It is the exact opposite of what the president promised ... to focus on large things, not small things".

“The president promised to focus on large things, not small things; he promised to bring us together, not divide us… It has to trouble you to have that level of intense partisanship as chief of staff if we're going to in fact come together as a country. And I just think either Emanuel's got to change, or the president's got to understand he is--he is going to have a very partisan regime.”

Comment by Boris Tiraspolsky:

I hold my great respect for Newt Gingrich and consider the former Speaker of the House of Representatives to be one of the brightest minds and greatest Statesmen of the Nation. Mr. Gingrich is right - currently we are witnessing “a deliberate strategy by the White House” and Democratic Party at-large. However, "the whole Rush Limbaugh thing" is just a tactical move.
 
Unfortunately, Mr. Gingrich along with many other Republicans pay too much attention to Democrats’ tactics and do not go far enough to define their true sinister “deliberate strategy”. And that seems what Democrats precisely want Republicans to do.

The current state of affairs between Democrats and Republicans reminds of a situation when a killer (Democrats) with a predetermined goal to murder his victim (the GOP) trying to find an excuse to do that by blaming their own victim. And the victim continues to believe that the cold bloded killer still has some human properties and honor.     

Both, Democrats and Republicans are major Forces in the ongoing U.S. Ideological Civil War for Fate of the Nation. Not being able to produce any original ideas and Ideals Democrats turn their heads to “wrong ideologies” and offer another variation of Socialism with an ultimate control of all aspects of people’s lives by State and bureaucracies.

Realistically speaking, there are only two real obstacles on the way of Democrats to achieve their ominous goal. One obstacle is the Constitution of the United States. No wonder, president Obama and his supporters consider the Supreme Law of the Land to be “unfinished document”.

Another real obstacle is the very existence of the Republican Party. Although, the latter is armed only with conservative views and obviously has no enough ideological ammunition effectively combat Democrats in current ideological battle, the GOP is the only Force being able to withstand invasion of sponsored and promoted by Democrats "wrong ideologies". 

The true “deliberate strategy of the White House” and the Democratic Party is to continue doing anything possible to diminish a role of the Republican Party in life of the Nation. Democrats will try to make the GOP irrelevant for the future of the American people.

By some hardly understandable reason Mr. Gingrich along with many other most prominent, influential and highly intellectual Republicans either do not see it, or reluctant to admit that eventually the Democrat’s “deliberate strategy” calls for a total annihilation of the Republican Party as an opposition Force.

Then, by amending, or rather re-writing the “unfinished” Constitution of the United States, president Obama and his cronies will justify their own “wrong ideologies“. Thus the Democrats can achieve their evil goal - to establish their unrestricted dictate unchallenged by the GOP, or anyone else. With the current ideological uncertainty in minds of the GOP's leaders Democrats have a good chance to succeed.   
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive