About Me

Name:Boris Tiraspolsky
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

It's time to stop the clock

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Friday, April 04, 2008 1:13:02 AM
"Sharia-compliant finance (SCF) is expanding among banks and securities houses eager to absorb the hundreds of billions of petrodollars cascading into the Middle East, thanks to $100-per-barrel oil."


Sharia-compliant financing must stop
By DEROY MURDOCK
 
Turn your clock back 70 years. Imagine that Wall Street banks and brokerages sold Nuremberg-compliant bonds and stock funds in 1938. American Nazi sympathizers bought financial instruments certified by Berlin-based advisors as free of "Jewish profits" from, say, Salomon Brothers and Bloomingdale's. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (14) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Public support for terrorist groups

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Thursday, April 03, 2008 1:11:23 AM
"CAIR’s recent and very public support for terrorist groups should be seen as a defiant challenge to those in our government who are no longer oblivious to the organization’s disquieting agenda. CAIR, in short, has sided with America’s enemies in the War on Terror. All that remains is for the U.S. government to hold the group to its word."



CAIR’s March With Terror
By Joe Kaufman
 
March has been a bad month for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). In recent weeks, the organization’s sympathy for Islamic terrorist groups like Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad has been revealed more clearly than ever, as CAIR personnel publicly expressed their support for the two groups. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

College we can believe in

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Tuesday, April 01, 2008 2:06:20 AM
"Unlike almost all other institutions of higher learning, Patrick Henry College deliberately reaches out to homeschooled students. It emphasizes the kind of general education core based on the classical liberal arts that once served as the hallmark of American higher education."


Patrick Henry College
______________________________________

Support real academic alternative
by Joseph Farah
 
It's so easy to focus all of our attention on the negative influences in our culture today. It's easy because there are so many of them. And it's necessary to expose them. But it is equally important to highlight the positive alternatives emerging within our cultural institutions – those that clearly provide the way home. It is not an exaggeration to say the U.S. academy – our entire system of colleges and universities – is corrupt, anti-Christian, anti-Western, even anti-American. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

System that undercuts self-sufficiency

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Monday, March 31, 2008 1:12:23 AM

"Friedrich Hayek wondered at Aristotle’s proposition that the ideal order was Autarkos [self sufficiency]. How could the great Aristotle be so ignorant? But have we, in the modern world, built a lasting foundation when all our invention, and all our development, has brought us a runaway bureaucratic mega-system that continually undercuts self-sufficiency?" 


Friedrich A. Hayek (1899-1992) - 1974 Nobel Prize winner in Economics,
an Austrian-British economist and political philosopher known for his defence of classical liberalism and free-market capitalism against socialist and collectivist thought in the mid-20th century. He is considered to be one of the most important economists and political philosophers of the twentieth century, 
_____________________________________________

Autarky and Ancient Wisdom
by J. R. Nyquist 

“Republicans who are shaky on protection are shaky all over.” 
– Joseph Wharton, Pennsylvania steel magnate

In 1892 Congressman William McKinley warned that abandoning American protectionism and adopting free trade would “revolutionize” the country’s values. Today America is flooded with foreign manufactures and our values have indeed been revolutionized. The influence of foreign money, of indebtedness to  foreigners, of dependence on foreign oil, hangs over Washington D.C. like a gallows. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Controversial film about Islam

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Sunday, March 30, 2008 1:11:52 AM

"Mr Wilders is adamant that he is not a racist. "We have to learn and defend who were are," he says."

Geert Wilders in the Dutch parliament (March 2008)
He is described as a 24/7 politician with no time for other interests

_____________________________________________________

Geert Wilder's "Fitna" and the Need to Respond
by Douglas Farah

The controversial Dutch film “Fitna” by Geets Wilder, a member of parliament, has been released in English and is causing quite a stir. This includes the expected outcry from many quarters, including many Muslim groups. Riots are predicted in Pakistan, Afghanistan and elsewhere. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Terrorism in the name of Islam

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Saturday, March 29, 2008 1:13:42 AM
"The historical dimension of Islamic terrorism- the doctrinal and organisational continuity from Hassan al-Sabbah to Bin Laden and al-Qaida must be understood, if the war against terrorism is to be waged, with any degree of success."



Historical Background to Islamic assassination

According to the Qur’an, sura XLV11, verses 3 and 4,'When you meet the unbelievers strike off their heads, and when you have laid them low bind them firmly'. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The first in protection?

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Friday, March 28, 2008 1:42:02 AM
"...interviews with analysts at the CIA, Defense Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency and other agencies revealed a common concern among analysts is that "the intelligence community used to do analysis but mostly now does reporting."



Analysts' funk
by Bill Gertz

Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Analysis Tom Fingar has given several recent speeches praising supposed improvements in U.S. intelligence analysis in the aftermath of the Iraq weapons of mass destruction failure. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bad religion immune to any cure

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Thursday, March 27, 2008 1:10:01 AM
"The words of Emma Lazarus "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddle masses yearning to breath free" are true about America:  victims of bigotry throughout the last two centuries have flocked to America precisely because it was a global haven for those who were persecuted and despised, denied equality and fair treatment.  These people sought America.  These people, emphatically, never damned America."




The religion of eternal racism and eternal sexism
By Bruce Walker

The Civil Rights Act was passed forty-three years ago.  The feminist movement was more or less officially launched about forty years ago.  And yet today in the Democrat Party there are serious voices complaining of racism and sexism among Democrat voters (and, presumably, among the American people.)   How many "civil rights" leaders talk as if racism is an immutable, eternal characteristic of American society?  How many feminist leaders talk as if sexism is an immutable, eternal characteristic of American society? Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

While we watch another Baywatch

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Wednesday, March 26, 2008 1:13:00 AM

"How many more are out there that we'll sacrifice in vain?  How many Stephanies before we finally stop the pain?  How long until our sanity comes back to us again?  Or will our wicked tendencies overtake us in the end?  I suppose the answer we all want, surely must be "why".  Everybody knows the answer:  Stephanie didn't have to die."



She Didn't Have To Die...
by Jeff Newcomb (Concepts2)
Member of 
There's something wrong with us, and the way we look at life.  The way we look at beauty and the way we handle strife.  There's something in this nation now that's very wrong to me. We can't solve all our ills with doctors schilling pills, or plastic surgery.  Stephanie Kuleba was a bright young girl with dreams, but she'll never get to chase them now, 'cause life's unfair, it seems. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reply to my critics...

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Monday, March 24, 2008 4:08:35 AM
"I want to tell my critics representing either “wrong ideologies“, or “ideology of no ideology” about their persistence to force meaningless debate at a time of battle in the middle of the battlefield. Whether you like or not it is in fact wartime aiding the enemy."
 

"Useful Art" of  World War II propaganda poster
 
The following is an example of what one of my critics says about my recent publications:”You mention in this post: "In a final analysis, modern terrorist warfare appears to be a new way of life that the Nation has to accept and endure for centuries ahead, and for a sake of own survival adjust to this new Reality of total World War..."

This view lacks perspective in my opinion. Our 'own survival?' Look at the casualties inflicted on our Nation to date at the hands of these pathetic, technologically retarded savages: statistically speaking, they have done no damage at all if you take into account other conflicts during our existence.

And now look at our successes in thwarting terrorist plots: those bozos who botched the Fort Dix plot, those idiots who botched the Sears Tower plot, (ad infinitem...). Boris, you know I read your material, but the basis of your entire blog is based on hyperbole: we as a Nation have got this under control, give or take. We've got it under control domestically. Our anti-terrorist effort is nearly as good or on par with the Israeli effort."

Here is my response. As a general rule I never reply to critics of my writings. They may say whatever they wish. I do not get into all these imposed discussions by two reasons. First one - my critics usually come up with extremely shallow and in most cases irrelevant ideas about complex issue of Ideologically charged battle with Terror in general and on the American soil in particular. Second reason - I do not think I ever will be able to change minds of my critics, regardless of how profound my reply could be.

I am not naïve to expect everyone to like what I say. However, I do wish as many people as possible to realize an extreme seriousness of the subject I write about - modern terrorist warfare and anti-terrorist Instruments and Forces necessary to withstand terrorist attacks with conventional weapons and Weapons of Mass Destruction on the American soil.

The United States are in long term battle with irreconcilable enemy - Islamic jihadists intending to exhaust all Nation’s human and economic resources and brake the Will of Nation to resist. Consequently, our enemy is determined to replace the Constitution of the United States with the Islamic Law as the Supreme Law of the Land. My firm position is to the best of my ability to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against U.S. ideological enemies.

Therefore, when I see a slightest attempt of diminishing a significance of the subject of modern terrorist warfare and/or inevitable dramatic impact battle with Terror makes on life of the Nation, I change my general rule not to reply to my critics. I want to tell my critics representing either “wrong ideologies“, or “ideology of no ideology” about their persistence to force meaningless debates at a time of battle in the middle of the battlefield. Whether you like or not it is in fact wartime aiding the enemy. 
 
Boris Tiraspolsky
Founding Member of
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Battle of wills with our adversaries

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Monday, March 24, 2008 1:12:23 AM
"He is our ally; he is my brother; he is the bravest man I know.  He is the man whom Islamists cannot silence."


Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury
 ______________________

The Man Islamists Cannot Silence
By Richard L. Benkin

He fired the first salvo in 2003 and has been sticking his thumb in Islamist eyes ever since.  Bangladeshi journalist Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury describes himself as a "Muslim Zionist."  He is unabashedly pro-US, pro-Israel, and anti-Islamist.  More importantly, he remains all of that from within the Muslim world, which he refuses to leave.  I have fielded any number of asylum requests for him, and he declined them all.  "Retreat is not in my vocabulary," he says, for he believes that if he were to leave his country, his credibility would be gone, and Islamists would claim victory; a satisfaction he refuses to give them.  "Bangladesh is my country," he says.  "Let the radicals leave!" Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Objectives of the War on Terrorism

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Sunday, March 23, 2008 1:19:35 AM
"There is no doubt, that the War on Terrorism is very different from all known battles in the history of the mankind. But what are exact objectives of the War on Terrorism, courageously conducted by the United States?"



Uncertainties in characterizations of enemy in the War on Terror
 by Boris Tiraspolsky
Founding Member of
Islamic terrorists waged a war against the United States. It is the war to exhaust the Nation’s human and economic resources and to brake the Nation’s will to resist Terror. The United States is forced to take a part in the total war in which terrorists employ as a weaponry ideology, economics, conventional, and non-conventional arms in order to obliterate the United States. 
 
In spite of that, there is still no clear understanding of what Terrorism is, who terrorists are, and what goals they pursue. Appearance on the historical stage of a so-called Islamic Terrorism made that understanding even more difficult. Consequently, there are no unmistakably defined realistic objectives, and there is no developed effective strategy in the Global War on Terror.
  
Some say the War on Terrorism is a conflict between States supporting Terrorism and fighting Terrorism. For instance, Afghanistan in 2002 standing behind terrorists on one side, and the International Coalition led by the United States fighting on the other one. This assumption is not necessarily true!
  
Bloody terrorist acts and anti-terrorist operations in Ireland, Chechnya, Philippines, Indonesia, and some other troubled countries are in fact variations of Civil Wars between different parts of the same nations. Quite the opposite, terrorists operating all over Europe come from different countries, but they all united with the same ideology of Islamic fundamentalism.

In contrast, the terrorist attack using a biological weapon that occurred in 1984 in the United States, for instance, was committed by members of the Rajneesh cult, and their philosophy blends Western and Eastern traditions, with special emphasis on Zen Buddhism.
 
Sarin nerve agent in the Tokyo subway was released in 1995 by members of Japanese cult called Aum Shinrikyo. Let’s not to forget that the second worse terrorist act in the history of the United States in Oklahoma City in 1995 was not conducted by people of Islamic believes either.

There is a widely spread “politically correct” notion that Terrorism is just a radical form of rebellion that derives out of a lack of “democracy“ and “prosperity“. In other words, inhuman terrorist acts are means to get “human rights“ and establish “democratic” States. Thus terrorists appear as some sort of “freedom fighters”. 

Mass murders committed by terrorists and justified with both ideological and social motives closely and unmistakably remind of Bolsheviks and Nazis. Both terrorist organizations had established own States and threatened with a total obliteration the rest of the World throughout the 20th century. 

It is obvious that Terrorism historically had, and Islamic Terrorism is not an exception, an infinite number of different faces and masks in order to cover up own evil nature, brutal goals, and bloody actions. There is no doubt, that the War on Terrorism is very different from all known battles in the history of the mankind. 

But what are exact objectives of the War on Terrorism, courageously conducted by the United States? Who is precisely the deceitful and sinister enemy ranged from Islamic jihadists attacked the Nation on the 9/11, 2001 to "homegrown terrorists" attacked the U.S. population the way it happened in Oklahoma-city in 1995? These most crucial questions are still not clear and remain to be answered. 

There are fundamental principles of  warfare that can be neither obsolete, nor ignored. An accurate definition of war objectives and clear characterizations of enemy are among axiomatic truths in conducting battle. They are essential for developing a coherent strategy and effective operational art for the War on Terror, or rather modern terrorist warfare. (Read more...) 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Superman Obama vs. Super Powerful Woman Clinton

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Friday, March 21, 2008 8:40:05 PM
"One big fact has largely been lost in the recent coverage of the Democratic presidential race: Hillary Rodham Clinton has virtually no chance of winning." - The Clinton myth

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Definition of Ideological Collaborator with Enemy

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Friday, March 21, 2008 3:28:22 AM

"Ideological Collaborator with Enemy is a category of Ethics and Esthetics. Terrorism is immoral and ugly, regardless of its intentions. It is ethically wrong to surrender to Terrorism, and politically, economically, socially, culturally  appease it, and collaborate with terrorists. In addition to being ethically wrong, it is esthetically appalling to beautify Terrorism in any form and any shape in arts, and abusing "fredom of speech", publicly praise enemy by using mass media. It is easy to recognize Ideological Collaborator with enemy. One who expresses views, thoughts, opinions pleasing enemy and/or demands actions in any way helping to achieve enemy's strategic goals is Ideological Collaboratlor with enemy." Boris Tiraspolsky Quotations and Maxims

There is a great deal of difference between appeasing enemy at a time of Peace
and coraborating with enemy at a time of War.  
The most notorious example of appeasing enemy was British PM Neville Chamberlain. 



PM Neville Chamberlain could be qualified as Ideological Collaborator with Enemy.

 
Collaboration with enemy at a time of War is high treason. 
The most famous case of collaboration with enemy at a time of war was Vidkun Quisling,  Minister President in occupied Norway from February 1942 to the end of World War II.


Vidkun Abraham Lauritz Jonssøn Quisling
His surname has become an eponym for "traitor", especially a collaborationist.

In some European languages, the term "quisling" has become a synonym for traitor, particularly one who collaborates with invaders.
The term was invented by the British newspaper The Times
in article of April 15, 1940, which was entitled "Quislings everywhere".
The article asserted: "There are Quislings in every country in Europe."
In almost seventy years one may assert that there are Quislings not only in Europe.

Vidkun Quisling at AllExperts

Contributed by Boris Tiraspolsky
Founding Member of
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Following a different gospel

Posted by Boris Tiraspolsky on Friday, March 21, 2008 1:12:24 AM
In a fiery sermon in April 2003, Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr. said: “The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes three-strike laws and wants them to sing God Bless America. “No! No No! “God damn America … for killing innocent people. “God damn America for threatening citizens as less than humans. “God damn America as long as she tries to act like she is God and supreme.”


Sen. Obama and Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr.
__________________________________

Left-brained 'Christians'
 
I've told you about the evangelicals who are searching for a new political identity – some of whom are calling themselves "Red Letter Christians."  And I've told you about one of these charlatans, by the name of Jim Wallis, who is hitting the Christian college circuit. I think I have a better name for these folks – "left-brained Christians." Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12345678910…3435Next »